From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:55:16 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from skerikoff.satca.net ([81.90.243.194]:14528 "EHLO smtp.satca.net")
	by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20808199AbZCFQzO (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org>); Fri, 6 Mar 2009 16:55:14 +0000
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.satca.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EEAE158A73
	for <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>; Fri,  6 Mar 2009 16:55:01 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at satca.net
Received: from smtp.satca.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (skerikoff.satca.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id uIf6pehBW+FI for <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>;
	Fri,  6 Mar 2009 17:54:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.51.254] (unknown [192.168.51.254])
	by smtp.satca.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A831589EF
	for <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>; Fri,  6 Mar 2009 16:54:58 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <49B1556E.3030903@satca.net>
Date:	Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:55:10 +0100
From:	Marian Jancar <m.jancar@satca.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20071114)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:	linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: gcc: mips32 vs mips3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-Path: <m.jancar@satca.net>
X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0)
X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
X-archive-position: 22028
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
X-original-sender: m.jancar@satca.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: linux-mips

Hi,

which option is supposed to compile faster code, -mips3 or -mips32?

Marian