From: Mike Rapoport <mike@compulab.co.il>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@towertech.it>,
rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
raph@8d.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc-v3020: add ability to access v3020 chip with GPIOs
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 12:03:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49B39803.2030505@compulab.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200903031308.29933.david-b@pacbell.net>
David,
David Brownell wrote:
> On Monday 02 March 2009, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>> +
>> +#define V3020_CS 0
>> +#define V3020_WR 1
>> +#define V3020_RD 2
>> +#define V3020_IO 3
>> +
>> +struct v3020_gpio {
>> + const char *name;
>> + unsigned int gpio;
>> +};
>> +
>
>> +static struct v3020_gpio v3020_gpio[] = {
>> + { "RTC CS", 0 },
>> + { "RTC WR", 0 },
>> + { "RTC RD", 0 },
>> + { "RTC IO", 0 },
>> +};
>
> After Andrew's fault path cleanup it looks OK, but I see
> no point to that GPIO struct with the name. You know the
> name based on the position, if you ever need one. Take
> that away, and you can add my ack.
>
>
> Also, best not to have a single static struct; there's
> no need to add a driver restriction that there be only
> one of these chips in a system.
What about the below version?
> - Dave
>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <mike@compulab.co.il>
CC: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@towertech.it>
CC: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-v3020.c | 183 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
include/linux/rtc-v3020.h | 6 ++
2 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-v3020.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-v3020.c
index 66955cc..9f29929 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-v3020.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-v3020.c
@@ -27,17 +27,155 @@
#include <linux/bcd.h>
#include <linux/rtc-v3020.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/gpio.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
#undef DEBUG
+struct v3020;
+
+struct v3020_chip_ops {
+ int (*map_io)(struct v3020 *chip, struct platform_device *pdev,
+ struct v3020_platform_data *pdata);
+ void (*unmap_io)(struct v3020 *chip);
+ unsigned char (*read_bit)(struct v3020 *chip);
+ void (*write_bit)(struct v3020 *chip, unsigned char bit);
+};
+
+#define V3020_CS 0
+#define V3020_WR 1
+#define V3020_RD 2
+#define V3020_IO 3
+
struct v3020 {
+ /* MMIO access */
void __iomem *ioaddress;
int leftshift;
+
+ /* GPIO access */
+ unsigned int gpio[4];
+
+ struct v3020_chip_ops *ops;
+
struct rtc_device *rtc;
};
+
+static int v3020_mmio_map(struct v3020 *chip, struct platform_device *pdev,
+ struct v3020_platform_data *pdata)
+{
+ if (pdev->num_resources != 1)
+ return -EBUSY;
+
+ if (pdev->resource[0].flags != IORESOURCE_MEM)
+ return -EBUSY;
+
+ chip->leftshift = pdata->leftshift;
+ chip->ioaddress = ioremap(pdev->resource[0].start, 1);
+ if (chip->ioaddress == NULL)
+ return -EBUSY;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void v3020_mmio_unmap(struct v3020 *chip)
+{
+ iounmap(chip->ioaddress);
+}
+
+static void v3020_mmio_write_bit(struct v3020 *chip, unsigned char bit)
+{
+ writel(bit << chip->leftshift, chip->ioaddress);
+}
+
+static unsigned char v3020_mmio_read_bit(struct v3020 *chip)
+{
+ return readl(chip->ioaddress) & (1 << chip->leftshift);
+}
+
+static struct v3020_chip_ops v3020_mmio_ops = {
+ .map_io = v3020_mmio_map,
+ .unmap_io = v3020_mmio_unmap,
+ .read_bit = v3020_mmio_read_bit,
+ .write_bit = v3020_mmio_write_bit,
+};
+
+static const char *v3020_gpio_names[] = {
+ "RTC CS",
+ "RTC WR",
+ "RTC RD",
+ "RTC IO",
+};
+
+static int v3020_gpio_map(struct v3020 *chip, struct platform_device *pdev,
+ struct v3020_platform_data *pdata)
+{
+ int i, err;
+
+ chip->gpio[V3020_CS] = pdata->gpio_cs;
+ chip->gpio[V3020_WR] = pdata->gpio_wr;
+ chip->gpio[V3020_RD] = pdata->gpio_rd;
+ chip->gpio[V3020_IO] = pdata->gpio_io;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(chip->gpio); i++) {
+ err = gpio_request(chip->gpio[i], v3020_gpio_names[i]);
+ if (err)
+ goto err_request;
+
+ gpio_direction_output(chip->gpio[i], 1);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+
+err_request:
+ while (--i >= 0)
+ gpio_free(chip->gpio[i]);
+
+ return err;
+}
+
+static void v3020_gpio_unmap(struct v3020 *chip)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(chip->gpio); i++)
+ gpio_free(chip->gpio[i]);
+}
+
+static void v3020_gpio_write_bit(struct v3020 *chip, unsigned char bit)
+{
+ gpio_direction_output(chip->gpio[V3020_IO], bit);
+ gpio_set_value(chip->gpio[V3020_CS], 0);
+ gpio_set_value(chip->gpio[V3020_WR], 0);
+ udelay(1);
+ gpio_set_value(chip->gpio[V3020_WR], 1);
+ gpio_set_value(chip->gpio[V3020_CS], 1);
+}
+
+static unsigned char v3020_gpio_read_bit(struct v3020 *chip)
+{
+ int bit;
+
+ gpio_direction_input(chip->gpio[V3020_IO]);
+ gpio_set_value(chip->gpio[V3020_CS], 0);
+ gpio_set_value(chip->gpio[V3020_RD], 0);
+ udelay(1);
+ bit = !!gpio_get_value(chip->gpio[V3020_IO]);
+ udelay(1);
+ gpio_set_value(chip->gpio[V3020_RD], 1);
+ gpio_set_value(chip->gpio[V3020_CS], 1);
+
+ return bit;
+}
+
+static struct v3020_chip_ops v3020_gpio_ops = {
+ .map_io = v3020_gpio_map,
+ .unmap_io = v3020_gpio_unmap,
+ .read_bit = v3020_gpio_read_bit,
+ .write_bit = v3020_gpio_write_bit,
+};
+
static void v3020_set_reg(struct v3020 *chip, unsigned char address,
unsigned char data)
{
@@ -46,7 +184,7 @@ static void v3020_set_reg(struct v3020 *chip, unsigned char address,
tmp = address;
for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
- writel((tmp & 1) << chip->leftshift, chip->ioaddress);
+ chip->ops->write_bit(chip, (tmp & 1));
tmp >>= 1;
udelay(1);
}
@@ -54,7 +192,7 @@ static void v3020_set_reg(struct v3020 *chip, unsigned char address,
/* Commands dont have data */
if (!V3020_IS_COMMAND(address)) {
for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
- writel((data & 1) << chip->leftshift, chip->ioaddress);
+ chip->ops->write_bit(chip, (data & 1));
data >>= 1;
udelay(1);
}
@@ -67,14 +205,14 @@ static unsigned char v3020_get_reg(struct v3020 *chip, unsigned char address)
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
- writel((address & 1) << chip->leftshift, chip->ioaddress);
+ chip->ops->write_bit(chip, (address & 1));
address >>= 1;
udelay(1);
}
for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
data >>= 1;
- if (readl(chip->ioaddress) & (1 << chip->leftshift))
+ if (chip->ops->read_bit(chip))
data |= 0x80;
udelay(1);
}
@@ -164,25 +302,23 @@ static int rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
int i;
int temp;
- if (pdev->num_resources != 1)
- return -EBUSY;
-
- if (pdev->resource[0].flags != IORESOURCE_MEM)
- return -EBUSY;
-
chip = kzalloc(sizeof *chip, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!chip)
return -ENOMEM;
- chip->leftshift = pdata->leftshift;
- chip->ioaddress = ioremap(pdev->resource[0].start, 1);
- if (chip->ioaddress == NULL)
+ if (pdata->use_gpio)
+ chip->ops = &v3020_gpio_ops;
+ else
+ chip->ops = &v3020_mmio_ops;
+
+ retval = chip->ops->map_io(chip, pdev, pdata);
+ if (retval)
goto err_chip;
/* Make sure the v3020 expects a communication cycle
* by reading 8 times */
for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
- temp = readl(chip->ioaddress);
+ temp = chip->ops->read_bit(chip);
/* Test chip by doing a write/read sequence
* to the chip ram */
@@ -196,10 +332,17 @@ static int rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
* are all disabled */
v3020_set_reg(chip, V3020_STATUS_0, 0x0);
- dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Chip available at physical address 0x%llx,"
- "data connected to D%d\n",
- (unsigned long long)pdev->resource[0].start,
- chip->leftshift);
+ if (pdata->use_gpio)
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Chip available at GPIOs "
+ "%d, %d, %d, %d\n",
+ chip->gpio[V3020_CS], chip->gpio[V3020_WR],
+ chip->gpio[V3020_RD], chip->gpio[V3020_IO]);
+ else
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Chip available at "
+ "physical address 0x%llx,"
+ "data connected to D%d\n",
+ (unsigned long long)pdev->resource[0].start,
+ chip->leftshift);
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, chip);
@@ -214,7 +357,7 @@ static int rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;
err_io:
- iounmap(chip->ioaddress);
+ chip->ops->unmap_io(chip);
err_chip:
kfree(chip);
@@ -229,7 +372,7 @@ static int rtc_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
if (rtc)
rtc_device_unregister(rtc);
- iounmap(chip->ioaddress);
+ chip->ops->unmap_io(chip);
kfree(chip);
return 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/rtc-v3020.h b/include/linux/rtc-v3020.h
index bf74e63..8ba646e 100644
--- a/include/linux/rtc-v3020.h
+++ b/include/linux/rtc-v3020.h
@@ -14,6 +14,12 @@
* is used depends on the board. */
struct v3020_platform_data {
int leftshift; /* (1<<(leftshift)) & readl() */
+
+ int use_gpio:1;
+ unsigned int gpio_cs;
+ unsigned int gpio_wr;
+ unsigned int gpio_rd;
+ unsigned int gpio_io;
};
#define V3020_STATUS_0 0x00
--
1.5.6.4
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-08 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-02 11:40 [PATCH] rtc-v3020: add ability to access v3020 chip with GPIOs Mike Rapoport
2009-03-02 11:40 ` [PATCH] rtc-v3020: coding style cleanup Mike Rapoport
2009-03-02 11:43 ` Alessandro Zummo
2009-03-02 11:40 ` [PATCH] rtc-v3020: add ability to access v3020 chip with GPIOs Mike Rapoport
2009-03-02 11:47 ` Alessandro Zummo
2009-03-02 12:18 ` Mike Rapoport
2009-03-03 21:08 ` David Brownell
2009-03-08 10:03 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2009-03-19 21:25 ` David Brownell
2009-03-02 22:36 ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-03 6:16 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49B39803.2030505@compulab.co.il \
--to=mike@compulab.co.il \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alessandro.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raph@8d.com \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.