From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1LgIlx-0005GC-Av for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 09:10:29 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LgIlv-0005Ea-6g for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 09:10:27 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LgIlt-0005Dl-C9 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 09:10:26 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45817 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LgIlt-0005De-6N for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 09:10:25 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]:11077) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LgIls-0002p7-JK for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 09:10:24 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l27so713954fgb.30 for ; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 06:10:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gRnHdUhY5YH3J1y/BvL4Sh4DPFauKTGQCqOEN5h5Dw4=; b=ScsTqautBl051MWwFp8Lq06RBg9VwPDOLNOB+wlMhpdu1pBV3KSkQqn36CL/0ZSSF5 Khz5/BPlcwO314Uj3FNcpguavtfgONao+ocjSb0c65sl5Y+VIudDsx/H8NKLhNKnJ51m L9+hML3GwPEUq0pNoFoKuSNPY9KOZOOMFTO2I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=sUn96B5MoQ41UQuG2Wpbxqavf/T0k4jIK6aLBCIwj+JhowgRfKL8vitGSpIdsEnGjM nySYw9v20UUoJX4XM9s8GDGy16aePI3V892eYlGD65PIg2t9Jt/EfXUBYX7fEZM6ByvE tGxcAcGmKzQAJQXQMslhjuguzYBaf2QzSL8xw= Received: by 10.86.53.11 with SMTP id b11mr3238890fga.70.1236517822614; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 06:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.25? (232-156.62-81.cust.bluewin.ch [81.62.156.232]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d4sm2190177fga.35.2009.03.08.06.10.21 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 08 Mar 2009 06:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49B3C3BD.5010306@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:10:21 +0100 From: phcoder User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <20090308130741.GD28707@thorin> In-Reply-To: <20090308130741.GD28707@thorin> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Unify rescue and normal commands X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 13:10:27 -0000 Robert Millan wrote: > On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 01:40:36AM +0800, Bean wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This patch unify the two command set, make them available in both >> rescue and normal mode. > > Could you provide a bit of insight on what we archieve with this? I assume > the idea is that a number of commands no longer need to drag normal.mod in, > which is useful for size constrained use cases (which ones do you have in > mind?). > > Is there something else to this? Does normal mode still work the same way? > It would also end up with the files like *_normal.c -- Regards Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko