From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: Another VMM on HVM guest
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:28:37 -0700
Message-ID: <49B6B155.4000506@goop.org>
References: <22493161.918111236670922632.JavaMail.coremail@app158.163.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=x-gbk; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <22493161.918111236670922632.JavaMail.coremail@app158.163.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Wu Bingzheng <wubingzheng@163.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Wu Bingzheng wrote:
> Hi men,
>
> Based on a CPU supporting full virtualization,
> can we install another VMM(hypervisor) on a HVM guest?
> I wish the picture explains my idea.
Yes, but VT/SVM are not themselves virtualized, so the nested hypervisor 
would have to be able to work without them (Xen w/ PV guests, for example).

J