All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
To: porte64@free.fr
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: read-only partitions: does the policy apply to all metadata ?
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:33:51 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49B6F8DF.9040409@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <355270241.1702481236702404399.JavaMail.root@spooler8-g27.priv.proxad.net>

porte64@free.fr wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> When a partition is mounted as read-only, does the kernel
> really prevent ANY byte to be written to it, including
> any metadata ?
> 
> (i am thinking here about file attributes -- last access time,
> as well as meta information about filesystem/blocks
> description etc ...).

As far as I know any of the visible attributes (last access, etc.) 
cannot be modified. However, mounting read-only may still write to the 
filesystem if the block device is writable, for example with ext3/ext4 
if the file system was not unmounted cleanly last time and the journal 
needs to be replayed.

> 
> And is the policy implemented in every filesystem type driver
> or at some abstraction level (as if the write() and like
> system calls were designed to return an error).
> 
> Unfortunately, on common (all?) hard drives, there seems
> to be no switch to set the device microcode in read-only
> mode.
> 
> By the way, this makes me also thing about memory cards
> with locks: is it a real protection or it is just a setting
> which tells the kernel that it *SHOULD* mount the device
> read-only ?

Normally the card reader indicates to the OS that the device is 
read-only, and then the kernel will mount it only read-only. However, 
note that some crappy SD card readers don't implement the write protect 
switch detection and will allow writing to a card marked read-only.

> 
> Please include my private address if you answer; i posted to the
> list because in some other forums we did not come up
> with a clear answer, so this is my last chance to get a
> definite done. However i didn't subscribe to the list as
> i have realized i am not able to help unfortunately:
> operating systems are the most complex thing ever design by humans !
> 
> Best regards
> Phil


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-10 23:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-10 16:26 read-only partitions: does the policy apply to all metadata ? porte64
2009-03-10 17:22 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-03-10 17:34   ` Alan Cox
2009-03-10 18:08     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-03-15 21:17     ` Pavel Machek
2009-03-10 23:33 ` Robert Hancock [this message]
2009-03-12  8:55   ` porte64

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49B6F8DF.9040409@gmail.com \
    --to=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=porte64@free.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.