From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LhRLB-0006fR-Ns
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:31:33 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LhRLA-0006dq-7o
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:31:33 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46722 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LhRL9-0006dU-Qv
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:31:31 -0400
Received: from lizzard.sbs.de ([194.138.37.39]:17878)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>) id 1LhRL9-0005Na-9n
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:31:31 -0400
Received: from mail1.sbs.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by lizzard.sbs.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
	n2BGVSKS019577
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:31:28 +0100
Received: from [139.25.109.167] (mchn012c.mchp.siemens.de [139.25.109.167]
	(may be forged))
	by mail1.sbs.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n2BGVS9H020284
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:31:28 +0100
Message-ID: <49B7E760.2090100@siemens.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:31:28 +0100
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <49B7C31F.5030201@siemens.com>
	<20090311161010.GB18390@shareable.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090311161010.GB18390@shareable.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [RESEND][PATCH] x86: Enhanced dump of segment
	registers
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> FS =0000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> 
>> LDT=0000 00000000 00000000 00008200 DPL=0 LDT
> 
> Both are =0000, but different descriptors - is that right?

Good question. My patch only parses to descriptor cache content without
evaluating the selector. I guess that 0x00008200 is a leftover from a
previous, valid LDT descriptor.

> 
> Also I'm thinking the null descriptor doesn't need to show offset and
> size:
> 
> FS =0000
> 
> is enough?

Yes, makes sense. IOW: stop parsing if selector == 0. Will post an update.

Thanks,
Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux