Rediffed. Is the splitting in 3 patches actually necessary? If yes in 
which order do you want them to be applied?
phcoder wrote:
> Hello all. It seems that gcc has trouble with -m32 when structure is 
> passed as argument. So I replaced that part by a pointer. Also I made 
> some improvements to ufs code to support solaris branch of ufs. I tested 
> it also with freebsd and netbsd's branch and it works fine on it too.
> As my 3 FS patches: mtime, FAT and UFS are interdependent I submit a 
> patch with all 3 features. If it's really necessary I can split them but 
> it requires a lot of unnecessary work
> 


-- 

Regards
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko