All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] introduce macro spin_event_timeout()
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:54:58 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49B83332.9040201@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1236808190.7086.61.camel@pasglop>

Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> Well, there's a non-empty set of HW where polling as fast as you can
> will effectively prevent it to make fwd progress...

Alan Cox mentioned this.  He gave PCI and 10us as an example.  I suggested 
adding a third parameter that would be a udelay() inserted into the loop.  He 
countered with this:

spin_until_timeout(readb(foo) & 0x80, 30 * HZ) {
	udelay(10);
	/* Maybe do other stuff */
}

But I don't know how to make that work *and* have it return a value indicating 
timeout or success.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-11 21:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-10 22:11 [PATCH v5] introduce macro spin_event_timeout() Timur Tabi
2009-03-10 22:33 ` Scott Wood
2009-03-10 22:37   ` Josh Boyer
2009-03-10 22:58     ` Scott Wood
2009-03-11  0:32       ` Josh Boyer
2009-03-10 23:59     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-03-11  0:22       ` Timur Tabi
2009-03-11  0:24         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-03-11 17:10           ` Grant Likely
2009-03-11 21:49             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-03-11 21:54               ` Timur Tabi [this message]
2009-03-11 22:49                 ` Scott Wood
2009-03-11  5:09         ` Roland Dreier
2009-03-11 16:31           ` Timur Tabi
2009-03-11 16:51             ` Scott Wood
2009-03-11 19:14               ` Timur Tabi
2009-03-11 19:22                 ` Scott Wood
2009-03-11 20:45                   ` Timur Tabi
2009-03-11 21:00                     ` Scott Wood
2009-03-11 21:02                       ` Timur Tabi
2009-03-11 21:03                         ` Scott Wood
2009-03-11  0:44       ` Josh Boyer
2009-03-10 23:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49B83332.9040201@freescale.com \
    --to=timur@freescale.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.