From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <49B9445B.7000105@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:20:27 -0400 From: Peter Staubach MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "David P. Quigley" CC: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, labeled-nfs@linux-nfs.org, nfsv4@ietf.org, nfs-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: New MAC label support Internet Draft posted to IETF website References: <1232651815.24537.15.camel@moss-terrapins.epoch.ncsc.mil> <4990AD20.3030902@redhat.com> <1236874108.27381.2.camel@moss-terrapins.epoch.ncsc.mil> In-Reply-To: <1236874108.27381.2.camel@moss-terrapins.epoch.ncsc.mil> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov David P. Quigley wrote: > So I am addressing the comments from the mailing list in the Labeled > NFSv4 draft and currently I'm working on Peter's concerns about the > delegation section. Reading through the NFSv4.1-29 version of the > specification it seems that section 10.2 gives all the reasons why this > should be done. Would it be wise to repeat some of the reasons in the > Labeled NFSv4 document or is it fine for me to reference section 10.2 of > the NFSv4.1 spec? My expectation would be that the goal would be to be part of the NFSv4.2 specification, so I would think that referencing the section of the NFSv4.1 specification would help the document editor. ps -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.