Delivered-To: phcoder@gmail.com Received: by 10.86.76.11 with SMTP id y11cs26669fga; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:53:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.59.4 with SMTP id m4mr1125041wak.37.1236977608372; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:53:28 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from sunset.davemloft.net ([74.93.104.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m29si807404poh.20.2009.03.13.13.53.27; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:53:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 74.93.104.97 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of davem@davemloft.net) client-ip=74.93.104.97; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 74.93.104.97 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of davem@davemloft.net) smtp.mail=davem@davemloft.net Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sunset.davemloft.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4D6C8D979 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:53:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:53:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20090313.135314.142627200.davem@davemloft.net> To: phcoder@gmail.com Subject: Re: ELF bugfixes From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <49BAC6E3.70502@gmail.com> References: <49BAC506.2030006@gmail.com> <20090313.134505.185970759.davem@davemloft.net> <49BAC6E3.70502@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.1 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: phcoder Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:49:39 +0100 > David Miller wrote: > > From: phcoder > > Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:41:42 +0100 > > > >> Actually our segment table is also our table for transforming > >> between virtual and physical address. I don't see why entry point > >> would be defined against virtual address of lowest physical segement > > I would suggest simply looping over the phdrs and remembering > > which one the e_entry falls into. > > Won't that make things work in the case you're describing? > > > I thought I have attached new patch. Sorry forgot to do so This patch looks good to me, FWIW.