From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: Build breakage between kvm-userspace.git HEAD and 2.6.29-rc8 Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:19:09 +0200 Message-ID: <49BCF23D.2030804@redhat.com> References: <49BA7D77.1010003@gmail.com> <49BCC914.4070204@redhat.com> <20090315101915.GF10892@redhat.com> <49BCDBC1.40006@redhat.com> <20090315104212.GG10892@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gregory Haskins , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Mark McLoughlin , Weidong Han To: Gleb Natapov Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:56647 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755074AbZCOMTO (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Mar 2009 08:19:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090315104212.GG10892@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Gleb Natapov wrote: >> Isn't #ifdef KVM_CAP_... sufficient? If it is defined it should imply >> everything needed for injection status is defined and works. >> >> > It should be sufficient. Just extra care. Remove? > I removed it locally and applied. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function