From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Chmielewski Subject: Re: strange guest slowness after some time Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:25:50 +0100 Message-ID: <49BF88BE.7040805@wpkg.org> References: <49B29705.6000904@wpkg.org> <49B4E7A6.3090601@redhat.com> <49B4EDC9.9020504@wpkg.org> <49B4EE8F.7050001@redhat.com> <49BD007C.9030809@wpkg.org> <49BF7FB6.9080503@wpkg.org> <49BF8686.5050707@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from mx03.syneticon.net ([78.111.66.105]:40374 "EHLO mx03.syneticon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754193AbZCQLZ4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2009 07:25:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <49BF8686.5050707@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Avi Kivity schrieb: > Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: >> >> After a week or so, network in one guest got slow with kvm-84 and no >> cpufreq. >> > > This is virtio, right? What about e1000? > > (I realize it takes a week to reproduce, but maybe you have some more > experience) Yes, all affected had virtio. Probably because I didn't have many guests with e1000 interface. After a guest gets slow, I stop it and add another interface, e1000. If it gets slow again, I'll check if e1000 interface is slow as well. Will keep you updated. -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org