All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Krzysztof Oledzki <ole@ans.pl>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>,
	pablo@netfilter.org,
	Netfilter Developer Mailing List
	<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: nf_conntrack.acct has no effect
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:32:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49BFA66A.4090700@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49BFA633.4010306@trash.net>

Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>
>>> Holger Eitzenberger wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 05:56:52PM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Currently the default is set based on the old config option.
>>>>> When unset, no acct-extend is allocated for *new* conntracks.
>>>>> The old ones that do have an acct-extend are still displayed.
>>>>
>>>> I think the current implementation is unfortunate, because the
>>>> connbytes match auto-selects CONFIG_NF_CT_ACCT, and you end up having
>>>> the message always and can't get rid of it other than patching
>>>> it out.
>>>
>>> Its only a compat option, it will get removed soon. 2.6.30 or 2.6.31
>>> I'd say.
>>
>> I have the patch ready. Do you think it is a good moment to push it 
>> now, so it will be included in 2.6.30, or should I rather wait for 
>> 2.6.31?
> 
> I'd say it has been long enough, but Jan raised a valid point.
> We can't use the Kconfig selection anymore once we remove that
> option, so we need a replacement to automatically enable counters.

Just to clarify: I'm talking about connbytes of course :)

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-17 13:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-16 16:53 nf_conntrack.acct has no effect Jan Engelhardt
2009-03-16 16:56 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-16 18:01   ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-03-17  8:24   ` Holger Eitzenberger
2009-03-17 13:02     ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-17 13:13       ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2009-03-17 13:31         ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-17 13:32           ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2009-03-17 13:50           ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2009-03-17 13:51             ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-17 13:55               ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2009-03-17 13:57                 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-17 14:18                   ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2009-03-17 14:22                     ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-17 14:36                       ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2009-03-17 14:38                         ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-17 13:11     ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2009-03-17 13:28       ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-03-17 13:52         ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2009-03-17 13:54           ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-17 14:39         ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-03-17 14:41           ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-17 15:41             ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-03-18  4:32               ` Patrick McHardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49BFA66A.4090700@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ole@ans.pl \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.