From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Marcel M. Cary" <marcel@earth.care2.com>
Subject: Re: Suggested Workflow Question
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:54:31 -0700
Message-ID: <49C07077.9020904@earth.care2.com>
References: <loom.20090317T175010-470@post.gmane.org> <49C04DFC.10201@earth.care2.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>
To: Roger Garvin <yoyodyn@gmail.com>
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 18 04:56:54 2009
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Ljmtf-0008Oh-PG
	for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 04:56:52 +0100
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752007AbZCRDye (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git-2@m.gmane.org>);
	Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:54:34 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751983AbZCRDye
	(ORCPT <rfc822;git-outgoing>); Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:54:34 -0400
Received: from autodiscover.earth.care2.com ([38.99.18.107]:10971 "EHLO
	exchange01.earth.care2.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751557AbZCRDyd (ORCPT
	<rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:54:33 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (63.146.170.241) by exchange01.earth.care2.com
 (10.102.0.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.0.813.0; Tue, 17 Mar 2009
 20:54:31 -0700
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801)
In-Reply-To: <49C04DFC.10201@earth.care2.com>
X-PureMessage: [Scanned]
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <git.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/113571>

Marcel Cary wrote:
> Roger Garvin wrote:
>> So we have a copy of the source on our office server, and another copy at each
>> customer site.

>> (Some customers also have separate development, and testing versions on their
>> servers as well.)

> There was an interesting discussion about maintaining per-client code on
> different branches recently, but I can't find it.

Here's the broader thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/113278

This is an abridged summary:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/110697

And this a nice explanation referenced by the summary:
http://gitster.livejournal.com/26540.html

Marcel