From: Felix Leimbach <felix.leimbach@gmx.net>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: strange guest slowness after some time
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 06:54:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49C08C92.4040706@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49BFD999.503@redhat.com>
Avi,
Avi Kivity wrote:
> packet counters are will within 32-bit limits. byte counters not so
> interesting.
This night my test overflowed the *packet* counters twice without any
slowness or loss of connectivity.
Snippet from my log file of the sending VM (linux 2.6.27):
Wed Mar 18 05:14:18 CET 2009: TX packet counter = 4292944043
Wed Mar 18 05:15:18 CET 2009: TX packet counter = 6259211
ifconfig after stress test:
# ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:74:01:01
inet addr:10.75.13.1 Bcast:10.75.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:150 Metric:1
RX packets:48950340 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:727911367 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:3686511201 (3.4 GiB) TX bytes:4207842269 (3.9 GiB)
I didn't create a log file on the receiving Windows VM but they must
have overflowed as well. Its packet counters are currently:
Sent: 47.112.780
Received: 1.515.275.693
No problem on the Windows guest either.
So the problem must lie elsewhere.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-18 5:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-07 15:47 strange guest slowness after some time Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-07 16:41 ` Johannes Baumann
2009-03-07 16:54 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-09 9:18 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-09 9:28 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-19 13:03 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-09 9:55 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-09 10:22 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-09 10:25 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-09 10:31 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-09 10:37 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-09 10:54 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-09 11:37 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-09 12:14 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-09 12:52 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-15 15:41 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-15 16:14 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-15 13:19 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 10:47 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 11:16 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-17 11:25 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 15:32 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-17 15:43 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 17:01 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-17 17:05 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-17 18:49 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-18 6:36 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-18 7:57 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-18 8:48 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-18 9:08 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-17 17:38 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-06-08 11:02 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-06-16 14:26 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-31 8:50 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-04-01 4:22 ` David S. Ahern
2009-04-01 6:21 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-04-06 15:19 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-04-08 0:49 ` Rusty Russell
2009-04-08 5:45 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-05-26 11:49 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-05-26 11:55 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-26 12:05 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-05-26 12:10 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-26 14:07 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-05-26 14:35 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-28 14:58 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-05-31 8:43 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-17 15:52 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-17 16:12 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 17:05 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-17 17:10 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-17 17:43 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 18:55 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 19:04 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-17 19:24 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 20:14 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 22:34 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 23:02 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-18 6:29 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-19 4:59 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-19 5:22 ` David S. Ahern
2009-03-19 6:08 ` David S. Ahern
2009-03-19 8:03 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-19 14:11 ` David S. Ahern
2009-03-17 18:57 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-18 5:54 ` Felix Leimbach [this message]
2009-03-17 16:27 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 17:14 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-17 17:19 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-17 17:34 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49C08C92.4040706@gmx.net \
--to=felix.leimbach@gmx.net \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mangoo@wpkg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.