Re: [PATCH] Define a version of lstat(2) specially for copy operation

[Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>]

Junio C Hamano schrieb:
> Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> So that Cygwin port can continue work around its supporting
>> library and get access to its faked file attributes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
>> ...
>> diff --git a/builtin-init-db.c b/builtin-init-db.c
>> index ee3911f..f3f781b 100644
>> --- a/builtin-init-db.c
>> +++ b/builtin-init-db.c
>> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static void copy_templates_1(char *path, int baselen,
>>  		else
>>  			exists = 1;
>>  
>> -		if (lstat(template, &st_template))
>> +		if (lstat_for_copy(template, &st_template))
>>  			die("cannot stat template %s", template);
>>  
>>  		if (S_ISDIR(st_template.st_mode)) {
> 
> Yuck; that's a bit too ugly for generic code.  Will there be other places
> that this needs to be used?  If so, we'd probably need to encourage its
> use where appropriate, which is even uglier but we cannot avoid it...
> 
> Also when the underlying system does not know the executable bit, how
> would this help?  I thought that earlier you said the part that checks if
> it wants to execute hooks with access(X_OK) will fail, so...

The "underlying system" in this case is Cygwin, and it *does* have an
executable bit.

But the FS gymnastics that implement it are slow and affect all lstat()
calls, so we have replaced lstat() with a simpler and faster
implementation. Only that the replacement doesn't know about the X bit
anymore; it always returns mode 0666.

Therefore, if a file is created whose mode is influenced by the fast
lstat(), then it will always be non-X. The access(, X_OK) call on the hook
script would do the right thing if only the script were created with the
correct mode. access(, X_OK) fails because the file was created with non-X
permissions.

-- Hannes