From: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>
To: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Cc: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/8] dm core: disable interrupt when taking map_lock
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:54:36 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49C0B6CC.2090005@ct.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49C0B474.4000204@ct.jp.nec.com>
This patch disables interrupt when taking map_lock to prevent
needless lockdep warnings in request-based dm.
request-based dm takes map_lock after taking queue_lock with
disabling interrupt:
spin_lock_irqsave(queue_lock)
q->request_fn() == dm_request_fn()
=> dm_get_table()
=> read_lock(map_lock)
while queue_lock could be taken in interrupt context.
So lockdep warns that a deadlock can happen:
write_lock(map_lock)
<interrupt>
spin_lock_irqsave(queue_lock)
q->request_fn() == dm_request_fn()
=> dm_get_table()
=> read_lock(map_lock)
Currently there is no such code path in request-based dm where
q->request_fn() is called from interrupt context, so no such deadlock
happens.
But such warning messages confuse users, so prevent them by disabling
interrupt when taking map_lock.
Signed-off-by: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
---
drivers/md/dm.c | 15 +++++++++------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Index: 2.6.29-rc8/drivers/md/dm.c
===================================================================
--- 2.6.29-rc8.orig/drivers/md/dm.c
+++ 2.6.29-rc8/drivers/md/dm.c
@@ -511,12 +511,13 @@ static int queue_io(struct mapped_device
struct dm_table *dm_get_table(struct mapped_device *md)
{
struct dm_table *t;
+ unsigned long flags;
- read_lock(&md->map_lock);
+ read_lock_irqsave(&md->map_lock, flags);
t = md->map;
if (t)
dm_table_get(t);
- read_unlock(&md->map_lock);
+ read_unlock_irqrestore(&md->map_lock, flags);
return t;
}
@@ -1929,6 +1930,7 @@ static int __bind(struct mapped_device *
{
struct request_queue *q = md->queue;
sector_t size;
+ unsigned long flags;
size = dm_table_get_size(t);
@@ -1960,10 +1962,10 @@ static int __bind(struct mapped_device *
__bind_mempools(md, t);
- write_lock(&md->map_lock);
+ write_lock_irqsave(&md->map_lock, flags);
md->map = t;
dm_table_set_restrictions(t, q);
- write_unlock(&md->map_lock);
+ write_unlock_irqrestore(&md->map_lock, flags);
return 0;
}
@@ -1971,14 +1973,15 @@ static int __bind(struct mapped_device *
static void __unbind(struct mapped_device *md)
{
struct dm_table *map = md->map;
+ unsigned long flags;
if (!map)
return;
dm_table_event_callback(map, NULL, NULL);
- write_lock(&md->map_lock);
+ write_lock_irqsave(&md->map_lock, flags);
md->map = NULL;
- write_unlock(&md->map_lock);
+ write_unlock_irqrestore(&md->map_lock, flags);
dm_table_destroy(map);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-18 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-18 8:44 [PATCH 0/8] request-based dm-multipath (v1) Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-03-18 8:50 ` [PATCH 1/8] dm core: add core functions for request-based dm Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-03-18 8:52 ` [PATCH 2/8] dm core: enable " Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-03-18 8:53 ` [PATCH 3/8] dm core: reject I/O violating new queue limits Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-03-18 8:54 ` Kiyoshi Ueda [this message]
2009-03-18 8:55 ` [PATCH 5/8] dm-mpath: convert to request-based Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-03-18 8:56 ` [PATCH 6/8] block: add gfp_mask parameter to bio_integrity_clone() Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-03-18 8:57 ` [PATCH 7/8] dm core: pass gfp_mask " Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-03-18 8:58 ` [PATCH 8/8] dm core: add integrity feature to request-based dm Kiyoshi Ueda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49C0B6CC.2090005@ct.jp.nec.com \
--to=k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.