From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oren Laadan Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] /proc/pid/checkpointable Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 05:28:53 -0400 Message-ID: <49C0BED5.9070203@cs.columbia.edu> References: <20090317174359.GA10796@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090317174359.GA10796-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Cc: Containers , "David C. Hansen" List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Catching up chronologically, I sent these to the previous version of your patch - but it's still relevant: https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers/2009-March/016307.html https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers/2009-March/016308.html Oren. Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > Started out implementing '/proc/pid/checkpointable' which reports 0 or 1 > depending on whether a process is checkpointable atm. But realized that > some patches that were discussed earlier are missing from Dave Hansen's > tree. > > This patchset includes those missing patches plus two new patches that > create /proc/pid/checkpointable. > > [PATCH 1/6] Checkpoint multiple processes > [PATCH 2/6] Restart multiple processes > [PATCH 3/6] Check 'may_checkpoint()' early > [PATCH 4/6] Deny external checkpoint unless task is frozen > [PATCH 5/6] Define and use proc_pid_checkpointable() > [PATCH 6/6] Explain reason for task being uncheckpointable >