From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Theurer <habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Defer remote tlb flushes on invlpg (v3)
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:03:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49C2509B.5060607@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49C24C9C.9080101@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Andrew Theurer wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>> KVM currently flushes the tlbs on all cpus when emulating invlpg. This
>> is because at the time of invlpg we lose track of the page, and leaving
>> stale tlb entries could cause the guest to access the page when it is
>> later freed (say after being swapped out).
>>
>> However we have a second change to flush the tlbs, when an mmu
>> notifier is
>> called to let us know the host pte has been invalidated. We can safely
>> defer the flush to this point, which occurs much less frequently. Of
>> course,
>> we still do a local tlb flush when emulating invlpg.
>>
> I should be able to run some performance comparisons with this in the
> next day or two.
Excellent. Note that while this does not improve performance relative
to released versions of kvm; rather it undoes a performance regression
caused by 967f61 ("KVM: Fix missing smp tlb flush in invlpg"), which
fixes a memory corruption problem.
The workloads which will exercise this are mmu-intensive smp workloads
with CONFIG_HIGHMEM (or CONFIG_HIGHMEM64) guests; 32-bit RHEL 3 is a
pretty bad offender.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-19 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-19 13:17 [PATCH] KVM: Defer remote tlb flushes on invlpg (v3) Avi Kivity
2009-03-19 13:46 ` Andrew Theurer
2009-03-19 14:03 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-03-29 10:36 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-11 16:48 ` [PATCH] KVM: Defer remote tlb flushes on invlpg (v4) Andrea Arcangeli
2009-04-12 22:31 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-04-18 15:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-04-19 17:54 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-04-20 13:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49C2509B.5060607@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.