All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Lawnick <nospam_lawnick-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
To: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]i2c: Make test for force on client probe possible
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:02:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49C34D97.1010603@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090313130942.5addd79e-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>

Sorry for the delay, had to fix a bug in u-boot...

Jean Delvare said the following:
> Hi Michael,
> 
> I don't know how you sent this mail, but that's not OK. If you intend
> to do kernel development, you have to use a real e-mail addresses all
> along the way.
> 
Discussed in PM.

> On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:15:57 +0100, Michael Lawnick wrote:
>> in new driver model 'kind' is no more provided for client's probe
>> function. The driver frame work creates the path
>> sys/bus/i2c/devices/[bus]-[dev]/ and populates it with the entries
>> modalias, name, subsystem@ and uevent. If probe fails (because the
>> device is not on bus at the moment) the client's sysFs-entries are not
>> created, but the entries above remain.
> 
> This is correct, and this is by design. This is how the Linux device
> driver model works, BTW, nothing i2c-specific there.
> 
Even if this is by (current linux) design, I think it is not ok ;-)
It leaves an inconsistent (not instable) system. IMHO either the entries
should be completely removed or completely created but not that half the
way.
Should we CC another list?

-- 
Regards,
Michael

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-20  8:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-13 10:15 [PATCH]i2c: Make test for force on client probe possible Michael Lawnick
     [not found] ` <49BA325D.7030308-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-13 12:09   ` Jean Delvare
     [not found]     ` <20090313130942.5addd79e-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-20  8:02       ` Michael Lawnick [this message]
     [not found]         ` <49C34D97.1010603-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-20  8:44           ` Jean Delvare

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49C34D97.1010603@gmx.de \
    --to=nospam_lawnick-mmb7mzphnfy@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.