From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: 2.6.29-rc7 pv_ops dom0 BUG / unable to handle kernel paging request Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:10:10 -0700 Message-ID: <49C3DC02.7010903@goop.org> References: <20090307175856.GL15052@edu.joroinen.fi> <49B3610C.2090101@goop.org> <20090308115400.GR15052@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090311205250.GJ15052@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090311212622.GK15052@edu.joroinen.fi> <49B84BE8.4020103@goop.org> <20090312083242.GM15052@edu.joroinen.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090312083242.GM15052@edu.joroinen.fi> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pasi_K=E4rkk=E4inen?= Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote: > Ok. I'll try that later.. I'll be away for 1,5 weeks (going to a vacati= on),=20 > so can't try right now.=20 > > One difference just came to my mind.. when booted on baremetal, whole 2= G of > ram is available.. when booted as dom0 I've limited dom0 memory to 1G.=20 > =20 That shouldn't be necessary any more. > I guess I should try with the same amount of memory available for both > dom0 and baremetal. > =20 I would expect the results to be the same, though the xen case might=20 fail more readily. Also, do you see this problem before you've started any other domains? =20 Or does it only happen once you've run a domU (or only while a domU is=20 running)? Thanks, J