From: Gianluca Guida <gianluca.guida@eu.citrix.com>
To: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@eu.citrix.com>,
Gianluca Guida <glguida@gmail.com>,
Wei Huang <wei.huang2@amd.com>,
Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][Patches] Xen 1GB Page Table Support
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:16:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49C3DD7F.3000000@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49C3A67B.9050209@eu.citrix.com>
Gianluca Guida wrote:
> George Dunlap wrote:
>> It might be nice to have some quick "sanity check" benchmarks, just to
>> make sure that adding the 1G pages won't hurt performance for the normal
>> case...
>
> Might do it, but I don't think it's necessary.
What I meant here is: checking that shadow performance hasn't decreased
shouldn't be necessary. It should be still worth, though, if we'd get
the kind of improvements this patch has on HAP.
Any numbers?
Gianluca
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-20 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-18 15:48 [RFC][Patches] Xen 1GB Page Table Support Huang2, Wei
2009-03-18 17:20 ` George Dunlap
2009-03-18 17:32 ` Keir Fraser
2009-03-18 17:45 ` Huang2, Wei
2009-03-18 19:15 ` Keir Fraser
2009-03-18 17:37 ` Huang2, Wei
2009-03-19 8:07 ` Huang2, Wei
2009-03-19 14:17 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-03-19 18:51 ` Wei Huang
2009-03-19 19:56 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-03-19 21:07 ` Wei Huang
2009-03-20 9:45 ` George Dunlap
2009-03-20 13:40 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-03-20 13:56 ` Wei Huang
2009-03-20 13:59 ` Gianluca Guida
2009-03-20 14:25 ` George Dunlap
2009-03-20 14:21 ` Gianluca Guida
2009-03-20 18:16 ` Gianluca Guida [this message]
2009-03-20 18:32 ` Huang2, Wei
2009-05-19 0:55 ` Keir Fraser
2010-01-13 4:07 ` Xu, Dongxiao
2010-01-13 16:27 ` Wei Huang
2010-01-14 1:36 ` Xu, Dongxiao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49C3DD7F.3000000@eu.citrix.com \
--to=gianluca.guida@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Keir.Fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Tim.Deegan@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
--cc=glguida@gmail.com \
--cc=wei.huang2@amd.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.