From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [216.145.245.200] (helo=mx04.dls.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lkrsu-0002xV-1h for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2009 04:28:32 +0100 Received: from [209.242.7.134] (helo=[192.168.231.111]) by mx04.dls.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lkrrp-0001pH-5e; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 22:27:25 -0500 Message-ID: <49C45E91.90703@dls.net> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 22:27:13 -0500 From: "Mike (mwester)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090302 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Khem Raj , openembedded-devel@openembedded.org References: <49C4516C.90607@dls.net> <200903202016.34258.raj.khem@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200903202016.34258.raj.khem@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Parse failure for the new RPM recipes X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 03:28:32 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Khem Raj wrote: > > Attached is a better fix. Is it OK ? > +1 from me -- parses correctly now, and while I don't build rpm, and therefore can't test it, that logic looks to be equivalent. Mike (mwester)