From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: KVM on Via Nano (Isaiah) CPUs? Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:53:46 +0200 Message-ID: <49C5FC9A.6080800@redhat.com> References: <200903180902.29139.andreas.tanz@kvt.de> <200903191805.05622.andreas.tanz@kvt.de> <49C27EC0.1090108@redhat.com> <200903201337.49355.andreas.tanz@kvt.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org To: andreas.tanz@kvt.de Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:48050 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751685AbZCVIxy (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Mar 2009 04:53:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200903201337.49355.andreas.tanz@kvt.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Andreas Tanz wrote: > Maybe the reason is elsewhere.... > I'm unable to build any GCC 4.* (build crashes in stage 2 with a segfault when creating build/genoutput). > I think there are some Nano specific x86-64-quirks gcc doesn't know about... > Further it's impossible to build glibc in multilib mode (x86-64 together with x68-32). > I'll post this in gentoo's bugzilla.... > Everything else compiles fine (with precompiled gcc and glibc) > It's quite possible that Via deviates from the VT spec in some way. It's also possible that kvm assumes something that isn't guaranteed by the spec but just happens to work; I'd like to find out which. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function