From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: KVM on Via Nano (Isaiah) CPUs? Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:36:48 +0200 Message-ID: <49C7F2E0.3020607@redhat.com> References: <200903180902.29139.andreas.tanz@kvt.de> <200903231439.34107.andreas.tanz@kvt.de> <49C797F6.8070308@redhat.com> <200903231833.46550.andreas.tanz@kvt.de> <49C7D7BE.8040807@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org To: andreas.tanz@kvt.de Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:58140 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753352AbZCWUgQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:36:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <49C7D7BE.8040807@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Avi Kivity wrote: > > Will talk to the specification and come up with further tests. > Please printk() vmcs_readl(GUEST_RFLAGS) (where you printk kvm_rip_read()). -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.