From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00 of 38] xen: add more Xen dom0 support
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:52:50 -0700
Message-ID: <49C84B02.6050601@goop.org>
References: <patchbomb.1226603398@abulafia.goop.org>
	<E2263E4A5B2284449EEBD0AAB751098401CE6DEBC6@PDSMSX501.ccr.corp.intel.com>
	<49C7B884.90306@goop.org>
	<E2263E4A5B2284449EEBD0AAB751098401CE6DEF79@PDSMSX501.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <E2263E4A5B2284449EEBD0AAB751098401CE6DEF79@PDSMSX501.ccr.corp.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Jiang, Yunhong wrote:
> I think both should be ok for dom0. Should the driver domain support be considered also now?
>   

I've only given them secondary consideration; keep them in mind, don't
do anything with precludes them from working, but no explicit effort to
make it work. PCI Passthrough is probably more important to keep in mind
(though there'd be a fair amount of overlap, I'd assume).

>> Are you thinking of putting a Xen hook in setup_msi_irq?
>>     
>
> Yes, exactly, I assume it is acceptable for changes under arch/x86/kernel/, like what changes for IOAPIC, am I right?
>   

Yes, it should be OK.

J