From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1Lm4Hk-0007j7-Q7 for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 06:55:08 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lm4Hi-0007hE-1c for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 06:55:06 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lm4Hd-0007fR-DC for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 06:55:05 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40134 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lm4Hd-0007fL-7J for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 06:55:01 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f167.google.com ([209.85.218.167]:58159) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lm4Hc-0004FS-J1 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 06:55:00 -0400 Received: by bwz11 with SMTP id 11so2007195bwz.42 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:54:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gV6fWyKai2syOCzJ6SRzEdARS4zip9y1N+8xlC0sz9E=; b=F6bZE8SaFEkBi+uSUtdJ15jjnquyEiDlW0HVZ6+wJvXLZVv9n2uHqH2J4cfSsP3rJM 1D7mUDAj9wMK1eEQWTPMHZNUT9mrfkal6HP9+ivaXKWzWJkH4qVwoL6hfQMruYZ+3y2S JW1o/B42YM8dQzgiU/auH/OeHaXcVR76w3n5I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=i7hmfsgq7BjQFb9bkaf+5kCq/8qZSUwJLiyNbY8yAA43Hm6okf2hKQ2xukdsotVMjd fsTPxJN06P9SvHkle9OyKfP7f0XjoeXVuD+jWXJDUnviUT3/0t7A1lZeNBMLVX8PbhKt llHrQuwwzJZplhf3uLSeuIYrxlcCMc/5g7smE= Received: by 10.223.110.144 with SMTP id n16mr6946136fap.63.1237892098357; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:54:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?82.130.83.110? (hpx-public-dock-110-dhcp.ethz.ch [82.130.83.110]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p9sm9371553fkb.1.2009.03.24.03.54.57 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:54:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49C8BC02.4090104@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:54:58 +0100 From: phcoder User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <49C780C3.4010403@gmail.com> <49C809BB.2000006@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Subject: Re: multiboot on EFI X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:55:06 -0000 Hello. I have to write rights to svn. And even if I had I would never commit a code in such stage (not reviewed, tested only on qemu, still in developement) However I'll rediff the code against HEAD when I'll have time uzer cheg wrote: > Dear Vladimir, > I tried rev 2030 and 2037. > And I also had few errors on patching stage. > > I think it is a good idea to commit your code to head branch. > I will wait for it and try it asap. > > Thank you. > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:14 AM, phcoder wrote: >> Try with 2030. Actually it's diffed against 2030+some of my posted and >> unposted patches. If it still doesn't apply please report I'll update and >> rediff it against HEAD. >> I'm interested in behaviour of this code on real EFI however doesn't expect >> this version to be able to work completely. >> x86_64-efi isn't supported by this patch yet >> Also if xen uses any bios interrupts it will probably triple fault. On IRC >> we discussed a possibility of loading seabios and it's probably feasible but >> will take more time >> uzer cheg wrote: >>> Vladimir, >>> >>> First of all I'd like to say thank you for a quick feedback and >>> development. >>> >>> I tried to apply your patches and test it on my Apple Xserve Intel 32 >>> bit. >>> I've done following; >>> >>> # svn co svn://svn.sv.gnu.org/grub/trunk/grub2 >>> # cd ./grub2 >>> # patch -b -p1 < ./uppermem.diff >>> patching file conf/i386.rmk >>> patching file lib/i386/uppermem.c >>> --- it's Ok >>> --- Than >>> # patch -b -p1 < ./efiboot.diff >>> patching file conf/common.rmk >>> Hunk #1 succeeded at 503 (offset -4 lines). >>> patching file conf/i386-coreboot.rmk >>> Hunk #1 succeeded at 99 with fuzz 2 (offset -3 lines). >>> Hunk #2 succeeded at 200 (offset -10 lines). >>> patching file conf/i386-efi.rmk >>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 80. >>> Hunk #2 FAILED at 103. >>> ... >>> etc. >>> >>> >>> I would like to ask you for what revision of grub2 this patches where >>> done? >>> Do I have to checkout any specific branch of grub2? >>> >>> Thank you in advance. >>> >>> 2009/3/23 phcoder : >>>> Hello. Here is an initial version of patch for booting multiboot kernels >>>> on >>>> i386-efi. No Changelog yet because it's not for inclusion yet. >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Grub-devel mailing list >>>> Grub-devel@gnu.org >>>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Grub-devel mailing list >>> Grub-devel@gnu.org >>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel >> >> -- >> >> Regards >> Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Grub-devel mailing list >> Grub-devel@gnu.org >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Grub-devel mailing list > Grub-devel@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel -- Regards Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko