From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boaz Harrosh Subject: Re: [PATCH] Driver 'sd' needs updating Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:33:02 +0200 Message-ID: <49C8FD2E.2060209@panasas.com> References: <20090324141428.31E5118C7A3@pentland.suse.de> <49C8F186.2080705@panasas.com> <49C8F5C0.7030308@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from gw-ca.panasas.com ([209.116.51.66]:29453 "EHLO laguna.int.panasas.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752705AbZCXPel (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:34:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <49C8F5C0.7030308@suse.de> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Hannes Reinecke Cc: James Bottomley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Hannes Reinecke wrote: >>> #endif /* _SCSI_SCSI_DRIVER_H */ >> I did not test this patch with osd_uld yet, but I will tomorrow. If my assumption >> is right then drv-core should call my osd_remove just the same, right? >> > Yes, correct. > >> Are there any different timing issue for example the presence of scsi_device >> is still true? >> > No. Or rather, none you'll notice. (We're effectively saving on indirection here, > but I doubt it'll be measureable) > > Cheers, > > Hannes Thanks, I've patched my testing Kernel, and am scheduled to run tests later tonight. I'm sure it will all work nicely minus the warning on load. Thanks for doing this Boaz