From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <49C91B24.2020304@domain.hid> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:40:52 +0100 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <49C7899F.5030306@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai LTTng support List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: vikesh rambaran Cc: xenomai-help vikesh rambaran wrote: > Thanx for the all feedback Jan and Andreas ! > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >>> However, I am having trouble with the following and would appreciate help >>> >>> a) "git clone git://git.kiszka.org/ipipe-2.6.git lttng/2.6.28-x86" >>> as per the email, results in the 2.6.29-rc6. What should the command be >>> to access the 2.6.28 tree ? >> Additionally try "git checkout lttng/2.6.28-x86". >> > > Ok, should have done some homework before asking that question :) > Worked through the fundamentals of the git usermanual. Fancy VCS ! > > For newbies to git (like me), the complete command i had to issue on the > cloned repository to > get the lttng branch was : > > git checkout -b v2.6.28-x86 origin/lttng/2.6.28-x86 That's the only advantage of svn over git: If you do not know a precise command for the moment, you can guess it and it will probably be right. Don't try this with git (like I did)... :) > > > >>> Note : downloading ipipe-2.6.28.7-x86-2.2-06 from >>> >> http://git.kiszka.org/?p=ipipe-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7abbb32f691345126d96cb6b48c587e145b8ef20 >>> using the web interface gives the 2.6.28.7 tree. Is this ok to use ? >>> >>> b) The LTTng manual mentions that there should be a kernel option >>> Linux Trace Toolkit Next Generation (LTTng) under General settings. This >>> seems to be >>> unavailable for both the above trees. What must be done to enable this >>> feature ? >> It will be available in the git branch that contains LTTng. >> > > Yes, see it now ! > > >>> c) Applying the xenomai instrumentation patch from >>> [http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.real-time.xenomai.devel/6009] >> to >>> the xenomai 2.4.7 >>> tree using patch -p1 < "filename", results in numerous hunks. What am i >>> doing wrong ? >> Hmm, I'm afraid the patch has to be back-ported manually. It was >> developed against the instrumentation points in trunk, 2.4.x looks a bit >> different (but you should be able to derive the adoption pattern from >> that patch). > > Ok , will do so and post the updated diff Looking forward! Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux