From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Subject: Re: The Plan
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:03:28 -0400
Message-ID: <49C990F0.2080207@hp.com>
References: <20090324.153506.44330862.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from g5t0009.atlanta.hp.com ([15.192.0.46]:47195 "EHLO
	g5t0009.atlanta.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752261AbZCYCDc (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:03:32 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20090324.153506.44330862.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

David Miller wrote:
> Everything in net-2.6 right now, as well as the final fix
> we come up with for the GRO issue will get sucked into
> net-next-2.6 as well as queued up for -stable.
> 
> Everything in patchwork right now will either be merged
> into net-next-2.6 or tossed.
> 

Hi David

Can you give any indication which way you are leaning on the IPv6 binding
patches?

I have some updates and can resubmit if you are planning on taking them.

Thanks
-vlad