From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: nftables-goes-automake patch series Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:30:58 +0100 Message-ID: <49CA5C42.6020204@trash.net> References: <1237937468-31476-1-git-send-email-jengelh@medozas.de> <49CA2D68.20601@trash.net> <49CA40B2.5010300@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:34176 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753319AbZCYQbF (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:31:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Wednesday 2009-03-25 15:33, Patrick McHardy wrote: >>>> About automake - I'm glad you're fixing up the makefiles, but I'm >>>> quite attached to the silent build and the automake version that >>>> comes with Debian unstable is 1.10, so I assume it won't be >>>> silent anymore. >>> I do have a patch for 1.10 too, if you need. >> I don't really want to compile my own automake. Can't we just keep >> the silent build in combination with automake? > > I am afraid I am not aware of any Makefile construct that would allow us > to have such (i.e. silent-by-default, and enabled with V=1) without > having to override the .c.o rules automake would normally provide. > Overriding $(CC) is not going to work. Well, I guess I'll give your patch to automake 1.10 a try.