From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: The most recent attempt to build 2.6.29-rc8 Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:28:11 -0700 Message-ID: <49CA69AB.1060104@goop.org> References: <276529.49208.qm@web56105.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <49C9E9AC.8070907@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: M A Young Cc: Boris Derzhavets , Xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org M A Young wrote: > That's strange because it wasn't when I sent it. I wonder if it got > mangled in-transit. It was an attachment, so it should have been resistant. Though it also had a '\0' on the end for good measure. >> Unfortunately this didn't help me; it still ended up making this 'm', >> which doesn't work. The simple fix is, I think, to make this a >> "bool", so it gets built in. Its not really big enough to bother with. > > I have been using XEN_XENBUS_FRONTEND=m on some of my kernels so it > didn't cause me a problem, though of course if any of the dependent > modules were "y" then that would indeed be incorrect. I did have an > alternate way of doing it that I could try. Hm. I wonder if there's a bunch of symbol exports missing. Or perhaps it's a secondary problem, like mkinitrd is not putting the right modules in place. J