From: Raman Gupta <rocketraman@fastmail.fm>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Reference for git.git release process
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:03:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49CAAA16.1080401@fastmail.fm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7viqlxz9go.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> "After a feature release is made from "master", however, "next" will
>> be rebuilt from the tip of "master" using the surviving topics"
>>
>> Does this mean:
>>
>> git branch -d next
>> git checkout -b next master
>> git merge ai/topic1_to_cook_in_next
>> git merge ai/topic2_to_cook_in_next
>
> That is more-or-less correct, even though I'd actually do either
>
> git branch -f next master
>
> or
>
> git checkout next
> git reset --hard master
>
> instead of deleting and recreating.
Is that a stylistic preference or does your approach have some
advantage over the delete/create? Doesn't git branch -f internally
delete and re-create?
This whole approach seems really workable and powerful -- the only
concern I had with this workflow was the difficult to understand
visualization of the history. So to repeat my earlier question: Are
there some canned gitk invocations, or other tips/tricks/approaches,
that can be used to make the visualization of the integration and
topic branches more intuitive?
Within the next couple of days I will probably submit a patch to
maintain-git.txt that includes the information you have relayed to me
here, as I think it may be useful to others.
Cheers,
Raman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-25 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-25 18:32 Reference for git.git release process Raman Gupta
2009-03-25 19:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-25 22:03 ` Raman Gupta [this message]
2009-03-25 23:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-26 3:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-26 2:27 ` Jeff King
2009-03-26 3:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-26 3:15 ` Jeff King
2009-03-26 3:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-26 3:49 ` Jeff King
2009-03-26 3:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-26 17:03 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-03-26 8:05 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-03-26 14:29 ` Raman Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49CAAA16.1080401@fastmail.fm \
--to=rocketraman@fastmail.fm \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.