* [U-Boot] Size of external u-boot commands
@ 2009-03-26 13:47 Jon Smirl
2009-03-26 13:52 ` Jerry Van Baren
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jon Smirl @ 2009-03-26 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
My networking hardware needs microcode loaded into it before it will
function. What's the best method to load this code? It's 70KB.
My current u-boot image is 170KB. I started working with the code in
examples and api_examples. But the "hello world" programs built using
those APIs are 65-72KB in size. That's almost half the size of my
u-boot image and these programs just print "hello world". Why are
these programs so big? My goal was to put the loader program and my
microcode into a single 128KB erase block.
My code for loading the microcode into the hardware is 7KB. Now it
looks like I will need to incorporate it into the main u-boot image
instead of making it an external command.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl at gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Size of external u-boot commands
2009-03-26 13:47 [U-Boot] Size of external u-boot commands Jon Smirl
@ 2009-03-26 13:52 ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-03-26 14:21 ` Jon Smirl
2009-03-26 15:21 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-03-26 20:27 ` Wolfgang Denk
2 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jerry Van Baren @ 2009-03-26 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Jon Smirl wrote:
> My networking hardware needs microcode loaded into it before it will
> function. What's the best method to load this code? It's 70KB.
>
> My current u-boot image is 170KB. I started working with the code in
> examples and api_examples. But the "hello world" programs built using
> those APIs are 65-72KB in size. That's almost half the size of my
> u-boot image and these programs just print "hello world". Why are
> these programs so big? My goal was to put the loader program and my
> microcode into a single 128KB erase block.
>
> My code for loading the microcode into the hardware is 7KB. Now it
> looks like I will need to incorporate it into the main u-boot image
> instead of making it an external command.
Hi Jon,
I suspect the example code is 98% C libraries and 2% nugget. In your
example, "hello world" probably uses the whole printf support tree
(strings, formatted printing, possibly floating point...).
I would suggest you make a stand-alone application that simply returns
and see how big it ends up. Depending on whether that is small or not,
check what libraries get linked with it and see how to create your
simple test app such that it doesn't use any extraneous libraries.
HTH,
gvb
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Size of external u-boot commands
2009-03-26 13:52 ` Jerry Van Baren
@ 2009-03-26 14:21 ` Jon Smirl
2009-03-26 14:37 ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-03-26 14:43 ` Rafal Jaworowski
0 siblings, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jon Smirl @ 2009-03-26 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Jerry Van Baren <gerald.vanbaren@ge.com> wrote:
> Jon Smirl wrote:
>>
>> My networking hardware needs microcode loaded into it before it will
>> function. What's the best method to load this code? It's 70KB.
>>
>> My current u-boot image is 170KB. I started working with the code in
>> examples and api_examples. But the "hello world" programs built using
>> those APIs are 65-72KB in size. ?That's almost half the size of my
>> u-boot image and these programs just print "hello world". Why are
>> these programs so big? My goal was to put the loader program and my
>> microcode into a single 128KB erase block.
>>
>> My code for loading the microcode into the hardware is 7KB. Now it
>> looks like I will need to incorporate it into the main u-boot image
>> instead of making it an external command.
>
> Hi Jon,
>
> I suspect the example code is 98% C libraries and 2% nugget. ?In your
> example, "hello world" probably uses the whole printf support tree (strings,
> formatted printing, possibly floating point...).
>
> I would suggest you make a stand-alone application that simply returns and
> see how big it ends up. ?Depending on whether that is small or not, check
> what libraries get linked with it and see how to create your simple test app
> such that it doesn't use any extraneous libraries.
Libraries appear to be the problem. A program that just returns is 100
bytes, add a puts("hello world") and it is 65KB.
I had expected the u-boot app examples to be smart and use the copy of
those libraries in the u-boot image. For example the demo program in
api_examples uses printf (65K library) instead of building an api
calling into u-boot for printf.
>
> HTH,
> gvb
>
--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl at gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Size of external u-boot commands
2009-03-26 14:21 ` Jon Smirl
@ 2009-03-26 14:37 ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-03-26 14:43 ` Rafal Jaworowski
1 sibling, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jerry Van Baren @ 2009-03-26 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Jerry Van Baren <gerald.vanbaren@ge.com> wrote:
>> Jon Smirl wrote:
>>> My networking hardware needs microcode loaded into it before it will
>>> function. What's the best method to load this code? It's 70KB.
>>>
>>> My current u-boot image is 170KB. I started working with the code in
>>> examples and api_examples. But the "hello world" programs built using
>>> those APIs are 65-72KB in size. That's almost half the size of my
>>> u-boot image and these programs just print "hello world". Why are
>>> these programs so big? My goal was to put the loader program and my
>>> microcode into a single 128KB erase block.
>>>
>>> My code for loading the microcode into the hardware is 7KB. Now it
>>> looks like I will need to incorporate it into the main u-boot image
>>> instead of making it an external command.
>> Hi Jon,
>>
>> I suspect the example code is 98% C libraries and 2% nugget. In your
>> example, "hello world" probably uses the whole printf support tree (strings,
>> formatted printing, possibly floating point...).
>>
>> I would suggest you make a stand-alone application that simply returns and
>> see how big it ends up. Depending on whether that is small or not, check
>> what libraries get linked with it and see how to create your simple test app
>> such that it doesn't use any extraneous libraries.
>
> Libraries appear to be the problem. A program that just returns is 100
> bytes, add a puts("hello world") and it is 65KB.
>
> I had expected the u-boot app examples to be smart and use the copy of
> those libraries in the u-boot image. For example the demo program in
> api_examples uses printf (65K library) instead of building an api
> calling into u-boot for printf.
No, the u-boot interface is *much* more basic than a library interface,
it is on the level of "read character" / "write character". Making a
trap interface at a library level would be a lot of work and would be a
large source of problems for something that is a simple utility function
(supporting stand-alone apps, that is)... a shared library interface is
non-trivial for a full blown OS.
Library interface issues was the pain and screaming you (may have) heard
when the world changed from a.out to DWARF to ELF and changing from
glibc5 to glibc6, etc.
If you work a bit at it, you should not need to use libraries in your
network loading app. If you can get by with just returning error codes,
you can do error printing back in u-boot. If you need to print, use
static strings so you don't pull in the world of string handling. You
may need to make your own print function (a limited printf() is pretty
simple) that sends your strings out using the u-boot "putc" interface.
gvb
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Size of external u-boot commands
2009-03-26 14:21 ` Jon Smirl
2009-03-26 14:37 ` Jerry Van Baren
@ 2009-03-26 14:43 ` Rafal Jaworowski
2009-03-26 15:06 ` Jon Smirl
1 sibling, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Rafal Jaworowski @ 2009-03-26 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 2009-03-26, at 15:21, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Libraries appear to be the problem. A program that just returns is 100
> bytes, add a puts("hello world") and it is 65KB.
>
> I had expected the u-boot app examples to be smart and use the copy of
> those libraries in the u-boot image. For example the demo program in
> api_examples uses printf (65K library) instead of building an api
> calling into u-boot for printf.
While I can understand your position, let me explain that the idea
behind the API was to provide calls to really elementary operations
and printf() wasn't considered as such (we only have print, get and
test a single character as far as console ops go); things like pre-
formatting should be done in the application...
The demo application is just a demo, it links in the same printf-
formatting code that U-Boot library uses, but specific standalone
applications are supposed to implement their own formatting routines.
Rafal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Size of external u-boot commands
2009-03-26 14:43 ` Rafal Jaworowski
@ 2009-03-26 15:06 ` Jon Smirl
2009-03-26 15:10 ` Jon Smirl
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jon Smirl @ 2009-03-26 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Rafal Jaworowski <raj@semihalf.com> wrote:
>
> On 2009-03-26, at 15:21, Jon Smirl wrote:
>
>> Libraries appear to be the problem. A program that just returns is 100
>> bytes, add a puts("hello world") and it is 65KB.
>>
>> I had expected the u-boot app examples to be smart and use the copy of
>> those libraries in the u-boot image. For example the demo program in
>> api_examples uses printf (65K library) instead of building an api
>> calling into u-boot for printf.
>
> While I can understand your position, let me explain that the idea behind
> the API was to provide calls to really elementary operations and printf()
> wasn't considered as such (we only have print, get and test a single
> character as far as console ops go); things like pre-formatting should be
> done in the application...
>
> The demo application is just a demo, it links in the same printf-formatting
> code that U-Boot library uses, but specific standalone applications are
> supposed to implement their own formatting routines.
I'm not sure that the size of the app is caused by libraries.
jonsmirl at terra:/home/apps/u-boot/api_examples$ ls -l demo.bin
-rwxr-xr-x 1 jonsmirl jonsmirl 79060 2009-03-26 10:58 demo.bin
now gzip the bin....
-rwxr-xr-x 1 jonsmirl jonsmirl 7677 2009-03-26 10:58 demo.bin.gz
Here's the map file; I'm trying to remember how to read it.
There's probably 64K of a data segment being initialized with zeros.
Archive member included because of file (symbol)
libglue.a(ppcstring.o) demo.o (memset)
libglue.a(glue.o) demo.o (ub_dev_get)
libglue.a(crc32.o) libglue.a(glue.o) (crc32)
libglue.a(libgenwrap.o) demo.o (printf)
libglue.a(vsprintf.o) libglue.a(libgenwrap.o) (vsprintf)
libglue.a(ctype.o) libglue.a(vsprintf.o) (_ctype)
libglue.a(string.o) libglue.a(vsprintf.o) (strnlen)
Allocating common symbols
Common symbol size file
___strtok 0x4 libglue.a(string.o)
Discarded input sections
.note.GNU-stack
0x0000000000000000 0x0 demo.o
.note.GNU-stack
0x0000000000000000 0x0 libglue.a(glue.o)
.note.GNU-stack
0x0000000000000000 0x0 libglue.a(crc32.o)
.note.GNU-stack
0x0000000000000000 0x0 libglue.a(libgenwrap.o)
.note.GNU-stack
0x0000000000000000 0x0 libglue.a(vsprintf.o)
.note.GNU-stack
0x0000000000000000 0x0 libglue.a(ctype.o)
.note.GNU-stack
0x0000000000000000 0x0 libglue.a(string.o)
Memory Configuration
Name Origin Length Attributes
*default* 0x0000000000000000 0xffffffffffffffff
Linker script and memory map
LOAD crt0.o
Address of section .text set to 0x40000
LOAD demo.o
LOAD libglue.a
0x0000000010000000 PROVIDE
(__executable_start, 0x10000000)
0x0000000010000094 . = (0x10000000 +
SIZEOF_HEADERS)
.interp
*(.interp)
.note.gnu.build-id
*(.note.gnu.build-id)
.hash
*(.hash)
.gnu.hash
*(.gnu.hash)
.dynsym
*(.dynsym)
.dynstr
*(.dynstr)
.gnu.version
*(.gnu.version)
.gnu.version_d
*(.gnu.version_d)
.gnu.version_r
*(.gnu.version_r)
.rel.dyn
*(.rel.init)
*(.rel.text .rel.text.* .rel.gnu.linkonce.t.*)
*(.rel.fini)
*(.rel.rodata .rel.rodata.* .rel.gnu.linkonce.r.*)
*(.rel.data.rel.ro* .rel.gnu.linkonce.d.rel.ro.*)
*(.rel.data .rel.data.* .rel.gnu.linkonce.d.*)
*(.rel.tdata .rel.tdata.* .rel.gnu.linkonce.td.*)
*(.rel.tbss .rel.tbss.* .rel.gnu.linkonce.tb.*)
*(.rel.ctors)
*(.rel.dtors)
*(.rel.got)
*(.rel.sdata .rel.sdata.* .rel.gnu.linkonce.s.*)
*(.rel.sbss .rel.sbss.* .rel.gnu.linkonce.sb.*)
*(.rel.sdata2 .rel.sdata2.* .rel.gnu.linkonce.s2.*)
*(.rel.sbss2 .rel.sbss2.* .rel.gnu.linkonce.sb2.*)
*(.rel.bss .rel.bss.* .rel.gnu.linkonce.b.*)
.rela.dyn 0x0000000010000094 0x0
*(.rela.init)
*(.rela.text .rela.text.* .rela.gnu.linkonce.t.*)
.rela.text 0x0000000000000000 0x0 crt0.o
*(.rela.fini)
*(.rela.rodata .rela.rodata.* .rela.gnu.linkonce.r.*)
*(.rela.data .rela.data.* .rela.gnu.linkonce.d.*)
*(.rela.tdata .rela.tdata.* .rela.gnu.linkonce.td.*)
*(.rela.tbss .rela.tbss.* .rela.gnu.linkonce.tb.*)
*(.rela.ctors)
*(.rela.dtors)
*(.rela.got)
*(.rela.got1)
*(.rela.got2)
.rela.got2 0x0000000000000000 0x0 crt0.o
*(.rela.sdata .rela.sdata.* .rela.gnu.linkonce.s.*)
*(.rela.sbss .rela.sbss.* .rela.gnu.linkonce.sb.*)
*(.rela.sdata2 .rela.sdata2.* .rela.gnu.linkonce.s2.*)
*(.rela.sbss2 .rela.sbss2.* .rela.gnu.linkonce.sb2.*)
*(.rela.bss .rela.bss.* .rela.gnu.linkonce.b.*)
.rel.plt
*(.rel.plt)
.rela.plt
*(.rela.plt)
.init
*(.init)
.text 0x0000000000040000 0x2930
*(.text .stub .text.* .gnu.linkonce.t.*)
.text 0x0000000000040000 0x38 crt0.o
0x0000000000040010 syscall
0x0000000000040034 search_hint
0x0000000000040000 _start
0x0000000000040024 syscall_ptr
.text 0x0000000000040038 0x890 demo.o
0x0000000000040260 test_dump_si
0x000000000004038c test_dump_sig
0x0000000000040404 main
0x0000000000040184 test_dump_buf
0x000000000004003c test_dump_di
.text 0x00000000000408c8 0x29c libglue.a(ppcstring.o)
0x00000000000408c8 strcpy
0x00000000000409e0 memmove
0x00000000000409e8 memcpy
0x000000000004090c strcat
0x0000000000040b3c memchr
0x00000000000408e4 strncpy
0x00000000000409d0 bcopy
0x0000000000040b0c memcmp
0x0000000000040a84 backwards_memcpy
0x0000000000040974 memset
0x0000000000040938 strcmp
0x000000000004095c strlen
.text 0x0000000000040b64 0x8e0 libglue.a(glue.o)
0x0000000000041058 ub_puts
0x0000000000040d30 ub_dev_recv
0x0000000000041200 ub_dev_enum
0x0000000000040fb0 ub_get_timer
0x000000000004102c ub_reset
0x00000000000410fc ub_getc
0x0000000000040ff8 ub_udelay
0x00000000000410bc ub_tstc
0x0000000000041360 api_search_sig
0x0000000000041088 ub_putc
0x0000000000040ec4 ub_dev_close
0x0000000000041140 ub_env_enum
0x0000000000040de8 ub_dev_read
0x0000000000040f34 ub_dev_open
0x0000000000040c20 ub_env_set
0x0000000000040c9c ub_dev_send
0x0000000000040c54 ub_env_get
0x0000000000040b68 ub_dev_get
0x00000000000412bc ub_get_sys_info
.text 0x0000000000041444 0x2b8 libglue.a(crc32.o)
0x0000000000041448 crc32
0x00000000000416dc crc32_wd
0x0000000000041598 crc32_no_comp
.text 0x00000000000416fc 0x15c libglue.a(libgenwrap.o)
0x00000000000417b4 printf
0x000000000004170c hang
0x00000000000416fc malloc
0x0000000000041714 do_reset
0x0000000000041774 vprintf
0x0000000000041734 udelay
0x0000000000041754 putc
.text 0x0000000000041858 0xc70 libglue.a(vsprintf.o)
0x0000000000041de4 vsprintf
0x0000000000041998 ustrtoul
0x000000000004195c simple_strtol
0x0000000000041d34 panic
0x0000000000042448 sprintf
0x000000000004185c simple_strtoul
.text 0x00000000000424c8 0x0 libglue.a(ctype.o)
.text 0x00000000000424c8 0x468 libglue.a(string.o)
0x00000000000427d4 memscan
0x0000000000042780 strswab
0x00000000000425a8 strnlen
0x0000000000042800 strrchr
0x0000000000042854 strstr
0x0000000000042524 strncmp
0x0000000000042670 strtok
0x00000000000424c8 strncat
0x00000000000428dc strdup
0x0000000000042728 strsep
0x00000000000425dc strspn
0x0000000000042574 strchr
0x0000000000042628 strpbrk
*(.text.*personality*)
*(.gnu.warning)
*(.glink)
.fini
*(.fini)
0x0000000000042930 PROVIDE (__etext, .)
0x0000000000042930 PROVIDE (_etext, .)
0x0000000000042930 PROVIDE (etext, .)
.rodata 0x0000000000042930 0x960
*(.rodata .rodata.* .gnu.linkonce.r.*)
.rodata.str1.4
0x0000000000042930 0x4f3 demo.o
0x4fb (size before relaxing)
*fill* 0x0000000000042e23 0x1 00
.rodata 0x0000000000042e24 0x5 demo.o
*fill* 0x0000000000042e29 0x3 00
.rodata.str1.4
0x0000000000042e2c 0x9 libglue.a(glue.o)
*fill* 0x0000000000042e35 0x3 00
.rodata 0x0000000000042e38 0x400 libglue.a(crc32.o)
.rodata.str1.4
0x0000000000043238 0x58 libglue.a(vsprintf.o)
0x57 (size before relaxing)
.rodata1
*(.rodata1)
.sdata2 0x0000000000043290 0x0
0x000000000004b290 PROVIDE (_SDA2_BASE_, 0x8000)
*(.sdata2 .sdata2.* .gnu.linkonce.s2.*)
.sbss2
*(.sbss2 .sbss2.* .gnu.linkonce.sb2.*)
.eh_frame_hdr
*(.eh_frame_hdr)
.eh_frame
*(.eh_frame)
.gcc_except_table
*(.gcc_except_table .gcc_except_table.*)
0x0000000000043290 . = (ALIGN (0x10000)
- ((0x10000 - .) & 0xffff))
0x0000000000053290 . = (0x10000
DATA_SEGMENT_ALIGN 0x1000)
.eh_frame
*(.eh_frame)
.gcc_except_table
*(.gcc_except_table .gcc_except_table.*)
.tdata
*(.tdata .tdata.* .gnu.linkonce.td.*)
.tbss
*(.tbss .tbss.* .gnu.linkonce.tb.*)
*(.tcommon)
.preinit_array 0x0000000000053290 0x0
0x0000000000053290 PROVIDE
(__preinit_array_start, .)
*(.preinit_array)
0x0000000000053290 PROVIDE
(__preinit_array_end, .)
.init_array 0x0000000000053290 0x0
0x0000000000053290 PROVIDE
(__init_array_start, .)
*(SORT(.init_array.*))
*(.init_array)
0x0000000000053290 PROVIDE (__init_array_end, .)
.fini_array 0x0000000000053290 0x0
0x0000000000053290 PROVIDE
(__fini_array_start, .)
*(.fini_array)
*(SORT(.fini_array.*))
0x0000000000053290 PROVIDE (__fini_array_end, .)
.ctors
*crtbegin.o(.ctors)
*crtbegin?.o(.ctors)
*(EXCLUDE_FILE(*crtend?.o *crtend.o) .ctors)
*(SORT(.ctors.*))
*(.ctors)
.dtors
*crtbegin.o(.dtors)
*crtbegin?.o(.dtors)
*(EXCLUDE_FILE(*crtend?.o *crtend.o) .dtors)
*(SORT(.dtors.*))
*(.dtors)
.jcr
*(.jcr)
.data.rel.ro
*(.data.rel.ro.local* .gnu.linkonce.d.rel.ro.local.*)
*(.data.rel.ro* .gnu.linkonce.d.rel.ro.*)
.got1
*(.got1)
.got2 0x0000000000053290 0x144
*(.got2)
.got2 0x0000000000053290 0x114 demo.o
.got2 0x00000000000533a4 0x18 libglue.a(glue.o)
.got2 0x00000000000533bc 0x4 libglue.a(crc32.o)
.got2 0x00000000000533c0 0x0 libglue.a(libgenwrap.o)
.got2 0x00000000000533c0 0x10 libglue.a(vsprintf.o)
.got2 0x00000000000533d0 0x0 libglue.a(ctype.o)
.got2 0x00000000000533d0 0x4 libglue.a(string.o)
.dynamic
*(.dynamic)
.got
*(.got)
0x00000000000533d4 . = (.
DATA_SEGMENT_RELRO_END 0x0)
.plt
*(.plt)
.data 0x00000000000533d4 0x100
*(.data .data.* .gnu.linkonce.d.*)
.data 0x00000000000533d4 0x0 crt0.o
.data 0x00000000000533d4 0x0 demo.o
.data 0x00000000000533d4 0x0 libglue.a(ppcstring.o)
.data 0x00000000000533d4 0x0 libglue.a(glue.o)
.data 0x00000000000533d4 0x0 libglue.a(crc32.o)
.data 0x00000000000533d4 0x0 libglue.a(libgenwrap.o)
.data 0x00000000000533d4 0x0 libglue.a(vsprintf.o)
.data 0x00000000000533d4 0x100 libglue.a(ctype.o)
0x00000000000533d4 _ctype
.data 0x00000000000534d4 0x0 libglue.a(string.o)
*(.gnu.linkonce.d.*personality*)
.data1
*(.data1)
.got
*(.got)
.sdata 0x00000000000534d4 0x0
0x000000000005b4d4 PROVIDE (_SDA_BASE_, 0x8000)
*(.sdata .sdata.* .gnu.linkonce.s.*)
0x00000000000534d4 _edata = .
0x00000000000534d4 PROVIDE (edata, .)
0x00000000000534d4 __bss_start = .
.sbss 0x00000000000534d4 0x4
0x00000000000534d4 PROVIDE (__sbss_start, .)
0x00000000000534d4 PROVIDE (___sbss_start, .)
*(.dynsbss)
*(.sbss .sbss.* .gnu.linkonce.sb.*)
.sbss 0x0000000000000000 0x0 crt0.o
.sbss 0x00000000000534d4 0x4 libglue.a(string.o)
0x00000000000534d4 ___strtok
*(.scommon)
0x00000000000534d8 PROVIDE (__sbss_end, .)
0x00000000000534d8 PROVIDE (___sbss_end, .)
.plt
*(.plt)
.bss 0x00000000000534d8 0x9c8
*(.dynbss)
*(.bss .bss.* .gnu.linkonce.b.*)
.bss 0x00000000000534d8 0x0 crt0.o
.bss 0x00000000000534d8 0x800 demo.o
.bss 0x0000000000053cd8 0x0 libglue.a(ppcstring.o)
.bss 0x0000000000053cd8 0x1c8 libglue.a(glue.o)
.bss 0x0000000000053ea0 0x0 libglue.a(crc32.o)
.bss 0x0000000000053ea0 0x0 libglue.a(libgenwrap.o)
.bss 0x0000000000053ea0 0x0 libglue.a(vsprintf.o)
.bss 0x0000000000053ea0 0x0 libglue.a(ctype.o)
.bss 0x0000000000053ea0 0x0 libglue.a(string.o)
*(COMMON)
0x0000000000053ea0 . = ALIGN ((. != 0x0)?0x4:0x1)
0x0000000000053ea0 . = ALIGN (0x4)
0x0000000000053ea0 . = ALIGN (0x4)
0x0000000000053ea0 _end = .
0x0000000000053ea0 PROVIDE (end, .)
0x0000000000053ea0 . = DATA_SEGMENT_END (.)
.stab
*(.stab)
.stabstr
*(.stabstr)
.stab.excl
*(.stab.excl)
.stab.exclstr
*(.stab.exclstr)
.stab.index
*(.stab.index)
.stab.indexstr
*(.stab.indexstr)
.comment 0x0000000000000000 0x7e
*(.comment)
.comment 0x0000000000000000 0x12 demo.o
.comment 0x0000000000000012 0x12 libglue.a(glue.o)
.comment 0x0000000000000024 0x12 libglue.a(crc32.o)
.comment 0x0000000000000036 0x12 libglue.a(libgenwrap.o)
.comment 0x0000000000000048 0x12 libglue.a(vsprintf.o)
.comment 0x000000000000005a 0x12 libglue.a(ctype.o)
.comment 0x000000000000006c 0x12 libglue.a(string.o)
.debug
*(.debug)
.line
*(.line)
.debug_srcinfo
*(.debug_srcinfo)
.debug_sfnames
*(.debug_sfnames)
.debug_aranges
*(.debug_aranges)
.debug_pubnames
*(.debug_pubnames)
.debug_info
*(.debug_info .gnu.linkonce.wi.*)
.debug_abbrev
*(.debug_abbrev)
.debug_line
*(.debug_line)
.debug_frame
*(.debug_frame)
.debug_str
*(.debug_str)
.debug_loc
*(.debug_loc)
.debug_macinfo
*(.debug_macinfo)
.debug_weaknames
*(.debug_weaknames)
.debug_funcnames
*(.debug_funcnames)
.debug_typenames
*(.debug_typenames)
.debug_varnames
*(.debug_varnames)
.debug_pubtypes
*(.debug_pubtypes)
.debug_ranges
*(.debug_ranges)
.gnu.attributes
*(.gnu.attributes)
/DISCARD/
*(.fixup)
*(.note.GNU-stack)
*(.gnu_debuglink)
OUTPUT(demo elf32-powerpc)
--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl at gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Size of external u-boot commands
2009-03-26 15:06 ` Jon Smirl
@ 2009-03-26 15:10 ` Jon Smirl
2009-03-26 16:40 ` Jon Smirl
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jon Smirl @ 2009-03-26 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Rafal Jaworowski <raj@semihalf.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2009-03-26, at 15:21, Jon Smirl wrote:
>>
>>> Libraries appear to be the problem. A program that just returns is 100
>>> bytes, add a puts("hello world") and it is 65KB.
>>>
>>> I had expected the u-boot app examples to be smart and use the copy of
>>> those libraries in the u-boot image. For example the demo program in
>>> api_examples uses printf (65K library) instead of building an api
>>> calling into u-boot for printf.
>>
>> While I can understand your position, let me explain that the idea behind
>> the API was to provide calls to really elementary operations and printf()
>> wasn't considered as such (we only have print, get and test a single
>> character as far as console ops go); things like pre-formatting should be
>> done in the application...
>>
>> The demo application is just a demo, it links in the same printf-formatting
>> code that U-Boot library uses, but specific standalone applications are
>> supposed to implement their own formatting routines.
>
> I'm not sure that the size of the app is caused by libraries.
>
> jonsmirl at terra:/home/apps/u-boot/api_examples$ ls -l demo.bin
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 jonsmirl jonsmirl 79060 2009-03-26 10:58 demo.bin
>
> now gzip the bin....
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 jonsmirl jonsmirl ?7677 2009-03-26 10:58 demo.bin.gz
>
> Here's the map file; I'm trying to remember how to read it.
> There's probably 64K of a data segment being initialized with zeros.
What is this doing? Can I turn it off?
.gcc_except_table
*(.gcc_except_table .gcc_except_table.*)
0x0000000000043290 . = (ALIGN (0x10000)
- ((0x10000 - .) & 0xffff))
0x0000000000053290 . = (0x10000
DATA_SEGMENT_ALIGN 0x1000)
--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl at gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Size of external u-boot commands
2009-03-26 13:47 [U-Boot] Size of external u-boot commands Jon Smirl
2009-03-26 13:52 ` Jerry Van Baren
@ 2009-03-26 15:21 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-03-26 20:27 ` Wolfgang Denk
2 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2009-03-26 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Thursday 26 March 2009 09:47:08 Jon Smirl wrote:
> My networking hardware needs microcode loaded into it before it will
> function. What's the best method to load this code? It's 70KB.
can the microcode access external memory (i.e. where u-boot lives) ? iirc,
the external functions are not linked statically into "u-boot applications".
the application uses function pointers that get relocated to point to u-boot
in external memory.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20090326/df34c97b/attachment.pgp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Size of external u-boot commands
2009-03-26 15:10 ` Jon Smirl
@ 2009-03-26 16:40 ` Jon Smirl
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jon Smirl @ 2009-03-26 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Rafal Jaworowski <raj@semihalf.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2009-03-26, at 15:21, Jon Smirl wrote:
>>>
>>>> Libraries appear to be the problem. A program that just returns is 100
>>>> bytes, add a puts("hello world") and it is 65KB.
>>>>
>>>> I had expected the u-boot app examples to be smart and use the copy of
>>>> those libraries in the u-boot image. For example the demo program in
>>>> api_examples uses printf (65K library) instead of building an api
>>>> calling into u-boot for printf.
>>>
>>> While I can understand your position, let me explain that the idea behind
>>> the API was to provide calls to really elementary operations and printf()
>>> wasn't considered as such (we only have print, get and test a single
>>> character as far as console ops go); things like pre-formatting should be
>>> done in the application...
>>>
>>> The demo application is just a demo, it links in the same printf-formatting
>>> code that U-Boot library uses, but specific standalone applications are
>>> supposed to implement their own formatting routines.
>>
>> I'm not sure that the size of the app is caused by libraries.
>>
>> jonsmirl at terra:/home/apps/u-boot/api_examples$ ls -l demo.bin
>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 jonsmirl jonsmirl 79060 2009-03-26 10:58 demo.bin
>>
>> now gzip the bin....
>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 jonsmirl jonsmirl ?7677 2009-03-26 10:58 demo.bin.gz
>>
>> Here's the map file; I'm trying to remember how to read it.
>> There's probably 64K of a data segment being initialized with zeros.
>
> What is this doing? Can I turn it off?
>
> .gcc_except_table
> ?*(.gcc_except_table .gcc_except_table.*)
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?0x0000000000043290 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?. = (ALIGN (0x10000)
> - ((0x10000 - .) & 0xffff))
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?0x0000000000053290 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?. = (0x10000
> DATA_SEGMENT_ALIGN 0x1000)
I don't know what I'm doing playing around with the linker scripts but
adding this:
.gcc_except_table : ONLY_IF_RO { KEEP (*(.gcc_except_table))
*(.gcc_except_table.*) }
to the script for api_example/demo makes the binary 50KB smaller.
-rwxr-xr-x 1 jonsmirl jonsmirl 16964 2009-03-26 12:08 demo.bin
>
>
> --
> Jon Smirl
> jonsmirl at gmail.com
>
--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl at gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Size of external u-boot commands
2009-03-26 13:47 [U-Boot] Size of external u-boot commands Jon Smirl
2009-03-26 13:52 ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-03-26 15:21 ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2009-03-26 20:27 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-03-26 20:50 ` Jon Smirl
2 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2009-03-26 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message <9e4733910903260647w549a97acv7101ea9347a767bb@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
> My networking hardware needs microcode loaded into it before it will
> function. What's the best method to load this code? It's 70KB.
>
> My current u-boot image is 170KB. I started working with the code in
> examples and api_examples. But the "hello world" programs built using
> those APIs are 65-72KB in size. That's almost half the size of my
> u-boot image and these programs just print "hello world". Why are
> these programs so big? My goal was to put the loader program and my
> microcode into a single 128KB erase block.
>
> My code for loading the microcode into the hardware is 7KB. Now it
> looks like I will need to incorporate it into the main u-boot image
> instead of making it an external command.
I'm not sure how you calcualte sizes, or how you link your
applications. Note that classical standalone application do not link
against any libraries, so they are really small:
-> size examples/{hello_world,timer}
text data bss dec hex filename
796 40 0 836 344 examples/hello_world
1556 56 0 1612 64c examples/timer
As you can see, the "hello world" demo program just needs a few
hundret bytes.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
The computer can't tell you the emotional story. It can give you the
exact mathematical design, but what's missing is the eyebrows.
- Frank Zappa
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Size of external u-boot commands
2009-03-26 20:27 ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2009-03-26 20:50 ` Jon Smirl
2009-03-26 21:15 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jon Smirl @ 2009-03-26 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> wrote:
> Dear Jon Smirl,
>
> In message <9e4733910903260647w549a97acv7101ea9347a767bb@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
>> My networking hardware needs microcode loaded into it before it will
>> function. What's the best method to load this code? It's 70KB.
>>
>> My current u-boot image is 170KB. I started working with the code in
>> examples and api_examples. But the "hello world" programs built using
>> those APIs are 65-72KB in size. ?That's almost half the size of my
>> u-boot image and these programs just print "hello world". Why are
>> these programs so big? My goal was to put the loader program and my
>> microcode into a single 128KB erase block.
>>
>> My code for loading the microcode into the hardware is 7KB. Now it
>> looks like I will need to incorporate it into the main u-boot image
>> instead of making it an external command.
>
> I'm ?not ?sure ?how ?you ?calculate ?sizes, ?or ?how ?you ?link ?your
> applications. ?Note that classical standalone application do not link
> against any libraries, so they are really small:
The *.bin files are ending up at 60-75K. Adding this to the linker
script fixes it.
.gcc_except_table : ONLY_IF_RO { KEEP (*(.gcc_except_table))
*(.gcc_except_table.*) }
Approximately 60KB of zeros are getting inserted into the *.bin files.
Before:
jonsmirl at terra:/home/apps/u-boot/examples$ ls *.bin -l
-rwxr-xr-x 1 jonsmirl jonsmirl 66424 2009-03-26 15:59 hello_world.bin
-rwxr-xr-x 1 jonsmirl jonsmirl 66460 2009-03-26 15:59 interrupt.bin
-rwxr-xr-x 1 jonsmirl jonsmirl 68464 2009-03-26 15:59 sched.bin
After the linker script change:
jonsmirl at terra:/home/apps/u-boot/examples$ ls *.bin -l
-rwxr-xr-x 1 jonsmirl jonsmirl 4136 2009-03-26 16:49 hello_world.bin
-rwxr-xr-x 1 jonsmirl jonsmirl 4128 2009-03-26 16:49 interrupt.bin
-rwxr-xr-x 1 jonsmirl jonsmirl 4184 2009-03-26 16:49 sched.bin
jonsmirl at terra:/home/apps/u-boot/examples$
>
> -> size examples/{hello_world,timer}
> ? text ? ?data ? ? bss ? ? dec ? ? hex filename
> ? ?796 ? ? ?40 ? ? ? 0 ? ? 836 ? ? 344 examples/hello_world
> ? 1556 ? ? ?56 ? ? ? 0 ? ?1612 ? ? 64c examples/timer
>
> As you can see, the "hello world" demo program just needs a few
> hundret bytes.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>
> --
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH, ? ? MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
> Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
> The computer can't tell you the emotional story. It can give you ?the
> exact mathematical design, but what's missing is the eyebrows.
> - Frank Zappa
>
--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl at gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Size of external u-boot commands
2009-03-26 20:50 ` Jon Smirl
@ 2009-03-26 21:15 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-03-26 21:35 ` Jon Smirl
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2009-03-26 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message <9e4733910903261350v21bf16c5l5729927048e0df3b@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure how you calculate sizes, or how you link your
> > applications. Note that classical standalone application do not link
> > against any libraries, so they are really small:
>
> The *.bin files are ending up at 60-75K. Adding this to the linker
Yes, but that's mostly empty space, due to the alignment requirments
in the linker script.
> script fixes it.
> .gcc_except_table : ONLY_IF_RO { KEEP (*(.gcc_except_table))
> *(.gcc_except_table.*) }
>
> Approximately 60KB of zeros are getting inserted into the *.bin files.
But this is just a "gap", it e. it is not used space; if you have
bigger program code, or if you change your alignment requirements, you
will see different (much smaller) values.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
If a packet hits a pocket on a socket on a port,
And the bus is interrupted as a very last resort,
And the address of the memory makes your floppy disk abort,
Then the socket packet pocket has an error to report! - Ken Burchill?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Size of external u-boot commands
2009-03-26 21:15 ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2009-03-26 21:35 ` Jon Smirl
2009-03-26 23:26 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jon Smirl @ 2009-03-26 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> wrote:
> Dear Jon Smirl,
>
> In message <9e4733910903261350v21bf16c5l5729927048e0df3b@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
>>
>> > I'm not sure how you calculate sizes, or how you link your
>> > applications. Note that classical standalone application do not link
>> > against any libraries, so they are really small:
>>
>> The *.bin files are ending up at 60-75K. ?Adding this to the linker
>
> Yes, but that's mostly empty space, due to the alignment requirments
> in the linker script.
>
>> script fixes it.
>> ? .gcc_except_table : ONLY_IF_RO { KEEP (*(.gcc_except_table))
>> *(.gcc_except_table.*) }
>>
>> Approximately 60KB of zeros are getting inserted into the *.bin files.
>
> But this is just a "gap", it e. it is not used space; if you have
> bigger program code, or if you change your alignment requirements, you
> will see different (much smaller) values.
I'm on powerpc.
The *.bin format is not smart enough to encode gaps. It just puts in
60KB of zeros.
My ELF files are 73KB.
-rwxr-xr-x 1 jonsmirl jonsmirl 73290 2009-03-26 16:49 hello_world
Tell me the right way to make these example programs small and I'll
submit a patch.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl at gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Size of external u-boot commands
2009-03-26 21:35 ` Jon Smirl
@ 2009-03-26 23:26 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-03-27 1:34 ` Jon Smirl
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2009-03-26 23:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message <9e4733910903261435x598055f8m74c5ac03ad16b67e@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> The *.bin format is not smart enough to encode gaps. It just puts in
> 60KB of zeros.
Yes, of course. A binary image cannot have holes in it.
> My ELF files are 73KB.
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 jonsmirl jonsmirl 73290 2009-03-26 16:49 hello_world
>
> Tell me the right way to make these example programs small and I'll
> submit a patch.
I don't see a problem that needs fixing. These are example problems.
The image size plays no role. If you have any specific requirements
for your own code, then adjust the linker script according to your
requirements.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Where there's no emotion, there's no motive for violence.
-- Spock, "Dagger of the Mind", stardate 2715.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Size of external u-boot commands
2009-03-26 23:26 ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2009-03-27 1:34 ` Jon Smirl
2009-03-27 10:37 ` Detlev Zundel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jon Smirl @ 2009-03-27 1:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> wrote:
> Dear Jon Smirl,
>
> In message <9e4733910903261435x598055f8m74c5ac03ad16b67e@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
>>
>> The *.bin format is not smart enough to encode gaps. It just puts in
>> 60KB of zeros.
>
> Yes, of course. A binary image cannot have holes in it.
>
>> My ELF files are 73KB.
>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 jonsmirl jonsmirl 73290 2009-03-26 16:49 hello_world
>>
>> Tell me the right way to make these example programs small and I'll
>> submit a patch.
>
> I don't see a problem that needs fixing. These are example ?problems.
> The ?image ?size plays no role. If you have any specific requirements
> for your own code, then adjust the linker script ?according ?to ?your
> requirements.
By providing a sample linker script to make the example programs
smaller, you could avoid discussions like this in the future.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl at gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Size of external u-boot commands
2009-03-27 1:34 ` Jon Smirl
@ 2009-03-27 10:37 ` Detlev Zundel
2009-03-27 10:57 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Detlev Zundel @ 2009-03-27 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Jon,
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> wrote:
>> Dear Jon Smirl,
>>
>> In message <9e4733910903261435x598055f8m74c5ac03ad16b67e@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
>>>
>>> The *.bin format is not smart enough to encode gaps. It just puts in
>>> 60KB of zeros.
>>
>> Yes, of course. A binary image cannot have holes in it.
>>
>>> My ELF files are 73KB.
>>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 jonsmirl jonsmirl 73290 2009-03-26 16:49 hello_world
>>>
>>> Tell me the right way to make these example programs small and I'll
>>> submit a patch.
>>
>> I don't see a problem that needs fixing. These are example ?problems.
>> The ?image ?size plays no role. If you have any specific requirements
>> for your own code, then adjust the linker script ?according ?to ?your
>> requirements.
>
> By providing a sample linker script to make the example programs
> smaller, you could avoid discussions like this in the future.
But as long as we do not understand what we change or what this does, we
may well get a lot of bug threads in return. And I have to admit, I'm
not to keen on that.
Cheers
Detlev
--
... and I will continue to use a low-level language to indicate how
machines actually compute. Readers who only want to see algorithms
that are already packaged in a plug-in way, using a trendy language,
should buy other people's books.
-- Donald Knuth, Fascicle 1
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-40 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: dzu at denx.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Size of external u-boot commands
2009-03-27 10:37 ` Detlev Zundel
@ 2009-03-27 10:57 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-03-27 11:17 ` Detlev Zundel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2009-03-27 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Dear Detlev,
In message <m27i2bl0a3.fsf@ohwell.denx.de> you wrote:
>
> > By providing a sample linker script to make the example programs
> > smaller, you could avoid discussions like this in the future.
>
> But as long as we do not understand what we change or what this does, we
> may well get a lot of bug threads in return. And I have to admit, I'm
> not to keen on that.
But we do understand what's going on, or am I missing something?
There is simply no linker script for the PowerPC examples, so the
default alignment settings for section alignment apply, and I think I
remember that ELF sections are aligned on 64k boundaries by default.
So if somebody wants a less generous alignment, all that needs to be
done is to set up a linker script that uses other alignment; it is a
matter of personal test or projec tneeds if you want to align this on
any specific boundary or if you shose some arbitrary value like 4k or
64 bytes or whatever.
The thing is, that these are examples, and use default settings.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Our business is run on trust. We trust you will pay in advance.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Size of external u-boot commands
2009-03-27 10:57 ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2009-03-27 11:17 ` Detlev Zundel
2009-03-27 12:47 ` Jon Smirl
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Detlev Zundel @ 2009-03-27 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Wolfgang,
> In message <m27i2bl0a3.fsf@ohwell.denx.de> you wrote:
>>
>> > By providing a sample linker script to make the example programs
>> > smaller, you could avoid discussions like this in the future.
>>
>> But as long as we do not understand what we change or what this does, we
>> may well get a lot of bug threads in return. And I have to admit, I'm
>> not to keen on that.
>
> But we do understand what's going on, or am I missing something?
I was referring to the other proposed change which I still do not
understand:
> The *.bin files are ending up at 60-75K. Adding this to the linker
> script fixes it.
> .gcc_except_table : ONLY_IF_RO { KEEP (*(.gcc_except_table))
> *(.gcc_except_table.*) }
I fully agree that the examples should rather use defaults because as
the name implies, they are examples after all, not tightly optimized
special cases.
Cheers
Detlev
--
Als ich entf?hrt wurde, begannen meine Eltern aktiv zu werden.
Sie vermieteten mein Zimmer.
-- Woody Allen
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-40 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: dzu at denx.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Size of external u-boot commands
2009-03-27 11:17 ` Detlev Zundel
@ 2009-03-27 12:47 ` Jon Smirl
2009-03-27 15:54 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jon Smirl @ 2009-03-27 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Detlev Zundel <dzu@denx.de> wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
>> In message <m27i2bl0a3.fsf@ohwell.denx.de> you wrote:
>>>
>>> > By providing a sample linker script to make the example programs
>>> > smaller, you could avoid discussions like this in the future.
>>>
>>> But as long as we do not understand what we change or what this does, we
>>> may well get a lot of bug threads in return. ?And I have to admit, I'm
>>> not to keen on that.
>>
>> But we do understand what's going on, or am I missing something?
>
> I was referring to the other proposed change which I still do not
> understand:
>
>> The *.bin files are ending up at 60-75K. ?Adding this to the linker
>> script fixes it.
>> ? .gcc_except_table : ONLY_IF_RO { KEEP (*(.gcc_except_table))
>> *(.gcc_except_table.*) }
>
> I fully agree that the examples should rather use defaults because as
> the name implies, they are examples after all, not tightly optimized
> special cases.
Providing an example linker script would show us the right way to
write it. I've never written a linker script for the ppc and I don't
know what I'm doing. Copying the the one over from the CPU directory
was not sufficient to make the app smaller.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl at gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Size of external u-boot commands
2009-03-27 12:47 ` Jon Smirl
@ 2009-03-27 15:54 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2009-03-27 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Friday 27 March 2009 08:47:40 Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Detlev Zundel <dzu@denx.de> wrote:
> > Hi Wolfgang,
> >
> >> In message <m27i2bl0a3.fsf@ohwell.denx.de> you wrote:
> >>> > By providing a sample linker script to make the example programs
> >>> > smaller, you could avoid discussions like this in the future.
> >>>
> >>> But as long as we do not understand what we change or what this does,
> >>> we may well get a lot of bug threads in return. And I have to admit,
> >>> I'm not to keen on that.
> >>
> >> But we do understand what's going on, or am I missing something?
> >
> > I was referring to the other proposed change which I still do not
> >
> > understand:
> >> The *.bin files are ending up at 60-75K. Adding this to the linker
> >> script fixes it.
> >> .gcc_except_table : ONLY_IF_RO { KEEP (*(.gcc_except_table))
> >> *(.gcc_except_table.*) }
> >
> > I fully agree that the examples should rather use defaults because as
> > the name implies, they are examples after all, not tightly optimized
> > special cases.
>
> Providing an example linker script would show us the right way to
> write it. I've never written a linker script for the ppc and I don't
> know what I'm doing. Copying the the one over from the CPU directory
> was not sufficient to make the app smaller.
ask the toolchain for the linker script its using. having u-boot duplicate it
leads to obvious bit rot scenarios. u-boot isnt an exercise in teaching you
how to read the linker manual.
link with -Wl,--verbose to see the default linker script that is used.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20090327/3294bd87/attachment.pgp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-27 15:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-03-26 13:47 [U-Boot] Size of external u-boot commands Jon Smirl
2009-03-26 13:52 ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-03-26 14:21 ` Jon Smirl
2009-03-26 14:37 ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-03-26 14:43 ` Rafal Jaworowski
2009-03-26 15:06 ` Jon Smirl
2009-03-26 15:10 ` Jon Smirl
2009-03-26 16:40 ` Jon Smirl
2009-03-26 15:21 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-03-26 20:27 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-03-26 20:50 ` Jon Smirl
2009-03-26 21:15 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-03-26 21:35 ` Jon Smirl
2009-03-26 23:26 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-03-27 1:34 ` Jon Smirl
2009-03-27 10:37 ` Detlev Zundel
2009-03-27 10:57 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-03-27 11:17 ` Detlev Zundel
2009-03-27 12:47 ` Jon Smirl
2009-03-27 15:54 ` Mike Frysinger
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.