From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [RFC v2 5/7] net: netfilter conntrack - add per-net functionality for TCP protocol Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:13:58 +0100 Message-ID: <49CB9BB6.3040004@trash.net> References: <20090311205706.141086138@gmail.com> <20090311210817.688725782@gmail.com> <20090316205825.GK7551@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, daniel.lezcano@free.fr, netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, xemul@openvz.org, adobriyan@gmail.com To: Cyrill Gorcunov Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:34245 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750868AbZCZPOH (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:14:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090316205825.GK7551@localhost> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > Here is an updated version which uses iterative assignment > of sysctl data. Please review. > --- > > From: Cyrill Gorcunov > Subject: [RFC v2 5/7] net: netfilter conntrack - add per-net functionality for TCP protocol > > Module specific data moved into per-net site and being allocated/freed > during net namespace creation/deletion. For this reason module_init/exit > calls added. I guess this isn't going to get any prettier :) Could you please send me the latest version of the missing patches against the current nf-next tree?