From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: Split kvm source tarballs
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:44:01 -0500
Message-ID: <49CC3D71.4050709@codemonkey.ws>
References: <49C64963.20601@redhat.com> <49CA2F16.1070905@codemonkey.ws> <49CA3058.3040600@redhat.com> <49CAA367.9050404@codemonkey.ws> <20090326085711.GA14193@infradead.org> <49CBC742.2020403@codemonkey.ws> <20090326224859.GB17658@infradead.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.92.27]:47311 "EHLO
	qw-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751913AbZC0CoI (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:44:08 -0400
Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 8so1015789qwh.37
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20090326224859.GB17658@infradead.org>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 01:19:46PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>   
>>> Slightly offtopic, but I always wondered why qemu is hosted in svn.  For
>>> all project having semi-forks of qemu that they try to keep in sync
>>> or even merge back a distributed scm would work so much better.
>>>   
>>>       
>> I'm going to switch it to git fwiw.
>>     
>
> If it's soon enough maybe the kvm repository reorganization should wait
> for it so that the new repository can be cloned from upstream qemu?
>   

It'll be compatible with the kernel.org git tree so there's no need to wait.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori