All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
To: Jan-Frode Myklebust <janfrode@tanso.net>
Cc: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [idea] web-application security powered by SELinux]
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:45:36 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49CC3DD0.2000202@ak.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090326102256.GA1353@janfrode.ibm.com>

Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:08:55AM +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
>> One idea is to add a security focused MPM which provide above features
>> and hooks for external modules.
>> I've actually developed a working example based on the "prefork" MPM.
>> When it accepts a request from the client, it creates a one-time thread
>> and assigns a new security context (which is a privileges set in SELinux),
>> then invokes contents handler.
>>
>>   http://code.google.com/p/sepgsql/source/browse/misc/httpd-selinux/
>>
>> However, I don't adhere the current implementation as is.
>> I would like to have a discussion to brush up the idea to achieve
>> the goal and to get acceptance in the mainline.
>>
>> Any comments, questions and others are welcome.
>>
> 
> I've been patiently hoping you would return to this idea, but it's
> not quite tackling my problem. I was hoping for something more
> similar to mod_privileges, where each virtual host is running in
> a separate selinux domain. That would be very usefull for ISP's
> offering virtual hostings to customers, and give the possibility
> of giving guest_t shell access to multiple users with unique
> namespaces.
> 
> It might not be necessary to run everything within the same apache
> process, maybe launch one per virtual host would be OK. But full
> mod_privileges-like support would be perfect.

Yes, it seems to me your problem consciousness is also worthfull
to achieve separation in virtual-host granularity, although its
goal is different from what I want to do.

The purpose of my efforts is to work every web-applications with
individual security context based on the client's identification.
We can also say it as a mapping between a web-user and a security
context.

> Has anybody tackled something like that with selinux ?

Sorry, my effort (currently) don't help to solve your problem.

Thanks,
-- 
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-27  2:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-25  1:08 [Fwd: [idea] web-application security powered by SELinux] KaiGai Kohei
2009-03-26 10:22 ` Jan-Frode Myklebust
2009-03-27  2:45   ` KaiGai Kohei [this message]
2009-03-27 12:47     ` Daniel J Walsh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49CC3DD0.2000202@ak.jp.nec.com \
    --to=kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=janfrode@tanso.net \
    --cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.