From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] conntrack: ecache: move event cache to conntrack extension infrastructure
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:52:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49CCA1DA.7060902@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090327094009.8259.64117.stgit@Decadence>
Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> This patch reworks the event caching infrastructure to use the
> conntrack extension infrastructure. As a result, you can enable and
> disable event delivery via /proc/sys/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_events
> in runtime opposed to compilation time. The main drawback is that
> we consume more memory per conntrack if event delivery is enabled.
> static inline void
> nf_conntrack_event_cache(enum ip_conntrack_events event, struct nf_conn *ct)
> {
> - struct net *net = nf_ct_net(ct);
> - struct nf_conntrack_ecache *ecache;
> -
> - local_bh_disable();
> - ecache = per_cpu_ptr(net->ct.ecache, raw_smp_processor_id());
> - if (ct != ecache->ct)
> - __nf_ct_event_cache_init(ct);
> - ecache->events |= event;
> - local_bh_enable();
> + spin_lock_bh(&nf_conntrack_lock);
> + __nf_conntrack_event_cache(event, ct);
> + spin_unlock_bh(&nf_conntrack_lock);
This defeats all the work we've been doing to make conntrack lockless.
This needs to be done differenty.
Generally, I'd say a better approach is to get rid of the notifier
chain (unnecessary overhead for the single user we have), replace it
by a function pointer for event delivery and use that as an indication
that events should be tracked.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-27 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-27 9:38 [PATCH 0/5] improve ctnetlink event reliability Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-03-27 9:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] netfilter: conntrack: remove events flags from userspace exposed file Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-03-27 9:39 ` [PATCH 2/5] netfilter: conntrack: use nf_ct_kill() to destroy conntracks Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-03-27 9:39 ` [PATCH 3/5] netfilter: conntrack: don't report events on module removal Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-03-27 9:40 ` [PATCH 4/5] conntrack: ecache: move event cache to conntrack extension infrastructure Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-03-27 9:52 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2009-03-27 11:37 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-03-27 11:41 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-27 11:57 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-03-27 11:58 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-27 9:40 ` [PATCH 5/5] ctnetlink: optional reliable event delivery Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-03-27 10:12 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-27 12:32 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-03-27 12:51 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-30 11:22 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49CCA1DA.7060902@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.