From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <49CCF4C4.2010802@domain.hid> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:46:12 +0100 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200903271538.10434.pwaechtler@domain.hid> <49CCE84E.7060708@domain.hid> <200903271641.09389.pwaechtler@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <200903271641.09389.pwaechtler@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] use case: possible to boot Posix subsystem in <50ms and then Linux? List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: pwaechtler@domain.hid Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org Peter W=E4chtler wrote: >> As a side note, I have a question for the automotive industry people. >> Would there be an interest in developing an OSEK skin for Xenomai? I >> have been thinking about that for some time, but still have not found >> time to start the job. I have read the OSEK spec, and found the >> interface pretty simple (though some part of the job has to be done >> offline, and annoyingly need to read XML files). The OSEK com spec, on= >> the other hand, looks rather scary. >=20 > There are open source OSEK implementations. AFAIK, all far from complet= eness. >=20 > You can start with > http://opensek.sourceforge.net/ >=20 > or have a look at the list at=20 > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSEK My question is: would you, people working for the automotive industry, use it. Do you need this, or is OSEK dead and people are using POSIX. --=20 Gilles.