From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Frank van der Linden <Frank.Vanderlinden@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix c/s 18938
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:22:51 -0600
Message-ID: <49CD0B6B.3040104@Sun.COM>
References: <49CD0E0F.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
	<200903271749.15350.Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
	<49CD1600.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-reply-to: <49CD1600.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Jan Beulich wrote:
> 
> And you expect a 32-bit kernel to be able to make sense of the MSRs
> corresponding to 64-bit-only registers?

The other fixes that you did for the MC hypercalls all only apply to the 
case of a 32bit dom0 on 64bit Xen too, so if we  care about that case, 
we should care about this case too, I guess.

I was aware of some of the alignment issues, but basically forgot about 
them, since we do 64bit dom0 on 64bit Xen only.

- Frank