From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LnHvz-0001JS-Mw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:41:43 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LnHvu-0001GP-Fg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:41:42 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40305 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LnHvu-0001G7-Bu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:41:38 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:31474) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LnHvu-0003dk-2t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:41:38 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f111.google.com ([209.85.221.111]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LnHvs-0007fh-Rp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:41:36 -0400 Received: by qyk9 with SMTP id 9so2152692qyk.4 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:41:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49CD2BEB.2020705@codemonkey.ws> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:41:31 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] svn 6658 broke powerpc. References: <200903171857.42875.rob@landley.net> <200903211344.55267.rob@landley.net> <200903242130.29317.rob@landley.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: The OpenBIOS Mailinglist Blue Swirl wrote: > Technically the best solution would be to introduce a stable tree also > to OpenBIOS like Qemu. But OpenBIOS development is not as fast paced > as Qemu, so I'm not sure if it's worth the effort. > > I can commit the latest version to Qemu SVN and if there are no > issues, update the version in stable before release. > It's your call. For bochs, we have a patch queue built in pc-bios. For stable, I'd add individual patches that fix issues if they came up. I generally wouldn't update to a newer bochs SVN though b/c bochs has a bad habit of breaking things upstream. So two options would be to include a new OpenBIOS version or just apply the patches that you think are important. Regards, Anthony Liguori