All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Raman Gupta <rocketraman@fastmail.fm>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add feature release instructions to gitworkflows man page
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:59:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49D10875.2060008@fastmail.fm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vk567ijlf.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> rocketraman@fastmail.fm writes:
> 
>> From: Raman Gupta <raman@rocketraman.com>
>>
>> Based on a mailing list discussion, add a description of the workflow,
>> and associated commands, for creating a feature release.
> 
> The same comment applies to the other one, but this commit log message is
> really lacking.  If you do not bother to summarize the discussion, place a
> pointer to the list archive, and more importantly, please describe *why*
> this change is desiable.

Ok will do.

> I am not sure rewinding and rebuilding of 'next', or even having 'next',
> is applicable for other projects as a BCP.  

Hmmm... The existing gitworkflows man page discusses the 'next' branch
several times. I am simply expanding the document to cover the branch
management associated with the git.git release process as well, which
necessarily includes a discussion of 'next'.

If you wish to remove discussion of 'next' from this document, that is
probably better done in a separate followup change. Though personally
I think its a useful concept for readers to learn about as they are
setting up their own workflows.

> Other parts (except for the "branch -f" bit I've already told you
> about in the other message) looked good.

I'll add some discussion about the branch -f bit -- I hope you agree
that in this document that is distributed with git, some
beginner-level explanation of the difference between the branch -f and
the merge approach is warranted?

Cheers,
Raman

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-30 18:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-30  5:35 [PATCH 1/2] Add feature release instructions to MaintNotes addendum rocketraman
2009-03-30  5:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] Add feature release instructions to gitworkflows man page rocketraman
2009-03-30  6:57   ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-30 17:59     ` Raman Gupta [this message]
2009-03-30 18:14       ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-30 18:40         ` Raman Gupta
2009-04-01 16:15           ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-30  6:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] Add feature release instructions to MaintNotes addendum Junio C Hamano
2009-03-30 17:57   ` Raman Gupta
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-03-26  1:56 rocketraman
2009-03-26  1:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] Add feature release instructions to gitworkflows man page rocketraman
2009-03-26  6:48   ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-26 14:35     ` Raman Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49D10875.2060008@fastmail.fm \
    --to=rocketraman@fastmail.fm \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.