* Re: Real-mode bug with AMD, gPXE, and 32-bit rep movs
[not found] ` <200903310456.39523.mcb30@etherboot.org>
@ 2009-03-31 7:21 ` Keir Fraser
2009-03-31 9:41 ` Fw: " George Dunlap
2009-03-31 13:06 ` Keir Fraser
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Keir Fraser @ 2009-03-31 7:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Brown, George Dunlap
Cc: Christoph Egger, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
etherboot-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, Tim Deegan,
Huang2, Wei, Sebastian Herbszt
On 31/03/2009 04:56, "Michael Brown" <mcb30@etherboot.org> wrote:
> It's a bug in the BIOS; it should either not advertise PMM, or it should
> follow the PMM spec and call the initialisation entry point in flat real
> mode.
Thanks Michael. I'll get this fixed.
-- Keir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: Fw: Real-mode bug with AMD, gPXE, and 32-bit rep movs
[not found] ` <200903310456.39523.mcb30@etherboot.org>
2009-03-31 7:21 ` Real-mode bug with AMD, gPXE, and 32-bit rep movs Keir Fraser
@ 2009-03-31 9:41 ` George Dunlap
2009-03-31 13:06 ` Keir Fraser
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: George Dunlap @ 2009-03-31 9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Brown
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
etherboot-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, Sebastian Herbszt
Michael Brown wrote:
> It's not a bug in gPXE.
Sorry, I'll be more careful in using the word "bug" in the future. At
any rate, I'm glad we've got it sorted out. Thanks for your help!
-George
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: Real-mode bug with AMD, gPXE, and 32-bit rep movs
[not found] ` <200903310456.39523.mcb30@etherboot.org>
2009-03-31 7:21 ` Real-mode bug with AMD, gPXE, and 32-bit rep movs Keir Fraser
2009-03-31 9:41 ` Fw: " George Dunlap
@ 2009-03-31 13:06 ` Keir Fraser
2009-03-31 13:21 ` George Dunlap
2 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Keir Fraser @ 2009-03-31 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Brown, George Dunlap
Cc: Tim Deegan, Christoph Egger, Huang2, Wei,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Sebastian Herbszt
On 31/03/2009 04:56, "Michael Brown" <mcb30@etherboot.org> wrote:
> It's a bug in the BIOS; it should either not advertise PMM, or it should
> follow the PMM spec and call the initialisation entry point in flat real
> mode.
George, can you please test with xen-unstable:19477. This should give all
our real-mode segments 4GB limits, and thus fix our PMM support.
-- Keir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: Re: Real-mode bug with AMD, gPXE, and 32-bit rep movs
2009-03-31 13:06 ` Keir Fraser
@ 2009-03-31 13:21 ` George Dunlap
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: George Dunlap @ 2009-03-31 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keir Fraser
Cc: Christoph Egger, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Tim Deegan,
Huang2, Wei, Michael Brown, Sebastian Herbszt
That seems to have done it. Now I can go back to what I was going to
do in the first place, which is test my new scheduler on an 8-core
system... :-)
-George
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> On 31/03/2009 04:56, "Michael Brown" <mcb30@etherboot.org> wrote:
>
>> It's a bug in the BIOS; it should either not advertise PMM, or it should
>> follow the PMM spec and call the initialisation entry point in flat real
>> mode.
>
> George, can you please test with xen-unstable:19477. This should give all
> our real-mode segments 4GB limits, and thus fix our PMM support.
>
> -- Keir
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread