From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: Xu Yang <onlyxuyang@qq.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
open-osd mailing-list <osd-dev@open-osd.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] libosd: BUG: blk_put_request called from within request_end_io
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:05:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49D24D59.90807@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49D24BD3.2030801@panasas.com>
A fix for a very serious and stupid bug in osd_initiator. It
used to call blk_put_request() regardless of if it was from
the end_io callback or if called after a sync execution.
It should call the unlocked version __blk_put_request() instead.
Also fixed is the remove of _abort_unexecuted_bios hack, and use of
blk_end_request(,-ERROR,) to deallocate half baked requests. I've
audited the code and it should be safe.
Reported and
Tested-by: Xu Yang <onlyxuyang@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
---
drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c b/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c
index 552f58b..2a5f077 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c
@@ -338,20 +338,6 @@ struct osd_request *osd_start_request(struct osd_dev *dev, gfp_t gfp)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(osd_start_request);
-/*
- * If osd_finalize_request() was called but the request was not executed through
- * the block layer, then we must release BIOs.
- */
-static void _abort_unexecuted_bios(struct request *rq)
-{
- struct bio *bio;
-
- while ((bio = rq->bio) != NULL) {
- rq->bio = bio->bi_next;
- bio_endio(bio, 0);
- }
-}
-
static void _osd_free_seg(struct osd_request *or __unused,
struct _osd_req_data_segment *seg)
{
@@ -363,9 +349,30 @@ static void _osd_free_seg(struct osd_request *or __unused,
seg->alloc_size = 0;
}
+static void _put_request(struct request *rq , bool is_async)
+{
+ if (is_async) {
+ WARN_ON(rq->bio);
+ __blk_put_request(rq->q, rq);
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * If osd_finalize_request() was called but the request was not
+ * executed through the block layer, then we must release BIOs.
+ * TODO: Keep error code in or->async_error. Need to audit all
+ * code paths.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(rq->bio))
+ blk_end_request(rq, -ENOMEM, blk_rq_bytes(rq));
+ else
+ blk_put_request(rq);
+ }
+}
+
void osd_end_request(struct osd_request *or)
{
struct request *rq = or->request;
+ /* IMPORTANT: make sure this agrees with osd_execute_request_async */
+ bool is_async = (or->request->end_io_data == or);
_osd_free_seg(or, &or->set_attr);
_osd_free_seg(or, &or->enc_get_attr);
@@ -373,12 +380,11 @@ void osd_end_request(struct osd_request *or)
if (rq) {
if (rq->next_rq) {
- _abort_unexecuted_bios(rq->next_rq);
- blk_put_request(rq->next_rq);
+ _put_request(rq->next_rq, is_async);
+ rq->next_rq = NULL;
}
- _abort_unexecuted_bios(rq);
- blk_put_request(rq);
+ _put_request(rq, is_async);
}
_osd_request_free(or);
}
--
1.6.2.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-31 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-31 16:58 [BUGFIX 0/2] BUG Fixes for OSD in mainline (2.6.30) Boaz Harrosh
2009-03-31 17:05 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2009-03-31 17:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] osd_uld: Remove creation of osd_scsi class symlink Boaz Harrosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49D24D59.90807@panasas.com \
--to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=onlyxuyang@qq.com \
--cc=osd-dev@open-osd.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.