From: "Mike (mwester)" <mwester@dls.net>
To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] make preferred openssl version match for -native recipe
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 22:03:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49D42B0B.4020505@dls.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49D17F70.8020109@dls.net>
Mike (mwester) wrote:
> I'd like to propose that we remove the "DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1"" line
> from openssl-native_0.9.8j.bb.
>
> This is causing a problem in select cases (for example, python-native
> fails "import md5"), because we build and stage openssl 0.9.8j, but the
> corresponding -native that gets built and staged is openssl 0.9.7g.
>
> The 0.9.8j version is currently selected as the PREFERRED_VERSION in the
> preferred-om-2008-versions.inc file, as well as for SlugOS. I've
> successfully built it on both 32 and 64 bit hosts.
>
> Unless there are objections, I'll commit a fix in a couple of days.
Fix committed. (To dev, not to the new stable branch.)
WARNING! The "correct" thing to do would probably be to bump up the PR
on all recipes that might include, directly or indirectly, openssh libs
-- thus forcing them all to link against the new version...
However, that seemed to be an awful lot of packages, and given that at
least some of the distros already have over-rides to select matching
versions for openssl and openssl-native, this would seem to cause more
problems than it would solve.
So anticipate that your builds may fail if a new version of openssl is
built; the failure mode would be the inability for the app to find the
old version of the library in the staging area.
Quite frankly, I found it easier to just blow away tmpdir on the
nslu2-linux autobuilders; they needed a fresh start anyway. ;-)
And now python-native works correctly.
Regards,
Mike (mwester)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-02 3:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-31 2:26 [RFC] make preferred openssl version match for -native recipe Mike (mwester)
2009-03-31 2:49 ` Tom Rini
2009-03-31 7:53 ` Henning Heinold
2009-04-02 3:03 ` Mike (mwester) [this message]
2009-04-02 8:56 ` Koen Kooi
2009-04-02 14:05 ` Mike (mwester)
2009-04-02 15:58 ` Koen Kooi
2009-04-02 19:41 ` Mike (mwester)
2009-04-02 16:23 ` Jeremy Lainé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49D42B0B.4020505@dls.net \
--to=mwester@dls.net \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.