Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus

[Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>]

Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> I don't think we even need that to end this debate.  I'm convinced we 
>> have a bug somewhere.  Even disabling TX mitigation, I see a ping 
>> latency of around 300ns whereas it's only 50ns on the host.  This 
>> defies logic so I'm now looking to isolate why that is.
>
> I'm down to 90us.  Obviously, s/ns/us/g above.  The exec.c changes 
> were the big winner... I hate qemu sometimes.
>
>

What, this:

> diff --git a/qemu/exec.c b/qemu/exec.c
> index 67f3fa3..1331022 100644
> --- a/qemu/exec.c
> +++ b/qemu/exec.c
> @@ -3268,6 +3268,10 @@ uint32_t ldl_phys(target_phys_addr_t addr)
>      unsigned long pd;
>      PhysPageDesc *p;
>  
> +#if 1
> +    return ldl_p(phys_ram_base + addr);
> +#endif
> +
>      p = phys_page_find(addr >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS);
>      if (!p) {
>          pd = IO_MEM_UNASSIGNED;
> @@ -3300,6 +3304,10 @@ uint64_t ldq_phys(target_phys_addr_t addr)
>      unsigned long pd;
>      PhysPageDesc *p;
>  
> +#if 1
> +    return ldq_p(phys_ram_base + addr);
> +#endif
> +
>      p = phys_page_find(addr >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS);
>      if (!p) {
>          pd = IO_MEM_UNASSIGNED;

The way I read it, it will run only run slowly once per page, then 
settle to a cache miss per page.

Regardless, it makes a memslot model even more attractive.


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function