From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cr3 OOS optimisation breaks 32-bit GNU/kFreeBSD guest
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 13:37:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49D73873.2090302@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090403214548.GA5394@amt.cnet>
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:47:33AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>>> index 2ea8262..48169d7 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>> @@ -3109,6 +3109,8 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
>>> kvm_write_guest_time(vcpu);
>>> if (test_and_clear_bit(KVM_REQ_MMU_SYNC, &vcpu->requests))
>>> kvm_mmu_sync_roots(vcpu);
>>> + if (test_and_clear_bit(KVM_REQ_MMU_GLOBAL_SYNC, &vcpu->requests))
>>> + kvm_mmu_sync_global(vcpu);
>>> if (test_and_clear_bit(KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH, &vcpu->requests))
>>> kvm_x86_ops->tlb_flush(vcpu);
>>> if (test_and_clear_bit(KVM_REQ_REPORT_TPR_ACCESS
>>>
>> Windows will (I think) write a PDE on every context switch, so this
>> effectively disables global unsync for that guest.
>>
>> What about recursively syncing the newly linked page in FNAME(fetch)()?
>> If the page isn't global, this becomes a no-op, so no new overhead. The
>> only question is the expense when linking a populated top-level page,
>> especially in long mode.
>>
>
> How about this?
>
> KVM: MMU: sync global pages on fetch()
>
> If an unsync global page becomes unreachable via the shadow tree, which
> can happen if one its parent pages is zapped, invlpg will fail to
> invalidate translations for gvas contained in such unreachable pages.
>
> So sync global pages in fetch().
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> index 09782a9..728be72 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> @@ -308,8 +308,14 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
> break;
> }
>
> - if (is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep) && !is_large_pte(*sptep))
> + if (is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep) && !is_large_pte(*sptep)) {
> + if (level-1 == PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL) {
> + shadow_page = page_header(__pa(sptep));
> + if (shadow_page->unsync && shadow_page->global)
> + kvm_sync_page(vcpu, shadow_page);
> + }
> continue;
> + }
>
> if (is_large_pte(*sptep)) {
> rmap_remove(vcpu->kvm, sptep);
>
But here the shadow page is already linked? Isn't the root cause that
an invlpg was called when the page wasn't linked, so it wasn't seen by
invlpg?
So I thought the best place would be in fetch(), after
kvm_mmu_get_page(). If we're linking a page which contains global ptes,
they might be unsynced due to invlpgs that we've missed.
Or am I missing something about the root cause?
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-04 10:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-23 0:33 cr3 OOS optimisation breaks 32-bit GNU/kFreeBSD guest Aurelien Jarno
2009-02-23 1:47 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-02-23 14:01 ` Aurelien Jarno
2009-02-23 14:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-02-23 14:59 ` Avi Kivity
2009-02-23 15:06 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-02-23 15:16 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-20 23:14 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-03-21 8:51 ` Aurelien Jarno
2009-03-22 9:35 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-23 17:27 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-03-24 9:47 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-24 11:49 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-04-03 21:45 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-04-04 10:37 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-04-04 17:01 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-04-05 8:41 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-05 11:29 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-04-05 11:41 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-04 23:23 ` Aurelien Jarno
2009-03-24 10:39 ` Aurelien Jarno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49D73873.2090302@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=aurelien@aurel32.net \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.