From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1Lq3Uq-0004uE-1t for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Apr 2009 06:53:08 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lq3Un-0004s1-VD for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Apr 2009 06:53:06 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lq3Ul-0004qt-Pk for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Apr 2009 06:53:04 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56742 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lq3Uk-0004qh-Jk for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Apr 2009 06:53:02 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]:26786) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lq3Uk-0001sH-18 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Apr 2009 06:53:02 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so582316fgg.7 for ; Sat, 04 Apr 2009 03:53:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cf2JHdwt3SNRS4GI7AyfClAVdmKdsAGSWC9tShd+cN0=; b=gxcZ0TZY/En+UtiJVXAKDtojczF14ESTOwNKfzKtMXeWnro0ISWwGQXnwziz+hcFj5 3B3Xo8Z+QChH/VVe/HtFi08mZyYqKECk0ggocAivzFsu8sttXcOGx2zRp7x1UzG+toUs mhyOLuu1BEPro/bc7mSOoGu1W+L3bRYle7pHk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HYM9m9x67r+tPHylzqpBJr3nFEvnCJknS8BuBUWjsmRwybrmpSxNirjt0J5RwZNdO8 yOXuD90eiT32Ag+1SY0SMWuMpRUwLX+xrEZozFsYRyaUhL0JS9gDGlO3aX6Ot4+aME1q JN9bjML5mIWPtXnbIoYvdDlnoYhQFqhFoY2F0= Received: by 10.86.27.19 with SMTP id a19mr1660200fga.29.1238842380616; Sat, 04 Apr 2009 03:53:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.2? (5-181.3-85.cust.bluewin.ch [85.3.181.5]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 3sm4832820fge.29.2009.04.04.03.53.00 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 04 Apr 2009 03:53:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49D73C0D.5080504@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 12:53:01 +0200 From: phcoder User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <49D52767.4050603@earthlink.net> <200904040344.52848.okuji@enbug.org> <49D65D3A.6040805@earthlink.net> <200904040412.43072.okuji@enbug.org> <49D6C15E.1010000@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: <49D6C15E.1010000@earthlink.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Subject: Re: Grub2 svn2059 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 10:53:06 -0000 BandiPat wrote: > Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: >> On Saturday 04 April 2009 04:02:18 BandiPat wrote: >>> Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: >>>> On Friday 03 April 2009 14:17:04 step21 wrote: >>>>> Hey, just a wild guess, but I think boot.mod got dropped and the boot >>>>> command is now included in minicmd.mod >>>> Yes, it seems so. And, it is a mistake that boot and some other >>>> commands >>>> are not built into the kernel. We must reduce modules, and let them >>>> back >>>> to the kernel. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Okuji >>> ----------- >>> In the meantime, how do we get the new svn to work then? Is there some >>> trick or something in the compile we need to do? Presently I'm using >>> svn2031 successfully. >> >> I guess you just have some outdated files. As "make" depends on >> timestamps, checking out from any kind of version control system can >> confuse "make". Try "make clean all". >> >> Regards, >> Okuji > ------------- > No, no outdated files. I download svn fresh and build from the fresh > download. I build a package for Zenwalk, so it's easily installed or > removed. There is never any need to "make clean all" due to the fact > I'm not using the same unarchived directory. > > I normally remove grub from the system before installing the new, so > that no old files are left behind. From what I can see from testing, > there is a bug in 2059. What that is, I'm afraid I don't know, but am > hoping you guys will clear it up soon. > > thanks, > Pat > Have you re-run grub-setup? -- Regards Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko