From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Bruin Subject: Re: root on nfs or other troubles Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 18:02:35 +0200 Message-ID: <49D8D61B.4030507@xs4all.nl> References: <49CAA7C0.3040109@xs4all.nl> <49D12DF4.7040902@xs4all.nl> <49D79749.3060906@xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <49D79749.3060906-qWit8jRvyhVmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Hans de Bruin wrote: > Hans de Bruin wrote: >> Hans de Bruin wrote: >> ... >> >>> >>> I could try an older kernel, say about half a year ago, but things >>> have changed in haf a year like the kernel verion of the nfs server, >>> nfs parmeters and kernel .config file. The second client (different >>> hardware) is as stable as a rock. >> >> so far 2.6.24 and 2.6.26 are stable > > After bisecting I ended somewehere in 2.6.29-rc7: > bad: [2e2a6a9f710255c87cef670fb71fc9e74bef1da2] sh_eth: Fix mistake of > the address of SH7763 > and apparently refixed in 2.6.29.1 -- Hans