From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Subject: Re: Moving the autofs list to vger.kernel.org?
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:04:31 +0800
Message-ID: <49D97F4F.80401@themaw.net>
References: <49D40EF4.7040709@zytor.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <49D40EF4.7040709@zytor.com>
List-Id: <autofs.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs>,
	<mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://linux.kernel.org/pipermail/autofs>
List-Post: <mailto:autofs@linux.kernel.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs>,
	<mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org
Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: autofs@linux.kernel.org, "FTPAdmin Kernel.org" <ftpadmin@kernel.org>

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This mailing list is the only high-volume mailing list still on
> linux.kernel.org.  I'm wondering if a migration to using vger.kernel.org
> like other mailing lists might be considered?
> 
> The reason I'm asking is because linux.kernel.org doesn't run an MTA
> suitable for mass delivery, and that implementing a better MTA is a
> pretty low priority given the demands.  So... perhaps?

Yes, I guess so, if you need to.
Majordomo isn't nearly as painless as Mailman though.

Ian